首页> 外文期刊>Oil and Gas Investor >RAKING THROUGH THE WRECKAGE
【24h】

RAKING THROUGH THE WRECKAGE

机译:穿过残骸

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

So first,what happened? The XOP,or S&P Oil & Gas Exploration & Production ETF,slumped by more than 20% in July-August,touching an all-time low on Aug.27.As pointed out by Simmons Energy,just one of the so-called FANG stocks,Facebook,now has a market cap-$525 billion as of mid-August-larger than the entire E&P sector,from Cono-coPhillips Co.at the high-end all the way down to micro-cap E&Ps.Oh,and by the way,you could add in 90% of Chevron Corp.’s market cap,to top it off,added Simmons.The sell-off leaves the energy components of the S&P at about 4.4%,down from 5.3% at the end of 2018.In part,the downward rerating of energy reflects fears of a protracted period of trade tensions or a possible recession.Under these circumstances,”risk-off or”haven assets”(U.S.Treasuries,gold)do better,while”risk-on”or”growth assets”(energy,copper)perform poorly.
机译:所以首先,发生了什么? XOP,或S&P石油和天然气勘探和生产ETF,7月至8月下跌了20%以上,触及8月27日的历史亮点.27.As被西蒙斯能源指出,只是所谓的芳 股票,Facebook,现在拥有市场上限 - 截至8月中旬 - 大于整个E&P扇区的5250亿美元,从Cono-Cophillips Co.AT远端一直到Micro-Cap E&Ps.oh,以及 这样的方式,您可以增加90%的Chevron Corp.的市场上限,以提高它,添加了Simmons。抛售落后的S&P的能量分量约为4.4%,从最终的5.3%下降 2018年,部分,能源的向下更快地反映了对跨越贸易紧张局势的恐惧或可能的经济衰退。在这些情况下,“危险或”避风港资产“(usterearies,黄金)做得更好,而”风险 - “或”增长资产“(能源,铜)表现不佳。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号