...
首页> 外文期刊>Age and Ageing: The Journal of the British Geriatrics Society and the British Society for Research on Ageing >The development of a geriatric postgraduate education assessment instrument using a modified Delphi procedure
【24h】

The development of a geriatric postgraduate education assessment instrument using a modified Delphi procedure

机译:使用改进的Delphi程序开发老年医学研究生教育评估工具

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

There is currently wide variation in the structure and content of higher medical training in geriatric medicine across Europe and no common framework within which existing efforts can be compared. We set out to develop an audit tool to compare training between countries. An initial review of indexed and grey literature was used to develop an audit tool which was used as the basis of an Internet-based modified Delphi process incorporating the views of 14 expert geriatricians from across Europe. Items in the audit tool were included or excluded when supported by >= 75% or <50% of respondents, respectively. Items supported by 50-74% of respondents were carried forward with additional suggestions and modifications included following Round 1. Thirteen experts representing 12 countries responded to both rounds. 40/45 items were supported at Round 1. Five items were carried forward. A further 13 elements were introduced for consideration at Round 2. Consensus was gained after the second round. The final tool describes 52 items across four domains: general considerations, topics referring to knowledge in patient care, different roles that should be considered in medical training and topics regarding assessment. The resulting tool can be used as a basis for comparing higher medical training programmes in geriatric medicine between countries. Individual countries can use this to audit current practice. At an European Union level, the insights gained through such audit will form the basis of future work to develop an agreed postgraduate curriculum in the specialty.
机译:目前,在欧洲,老年医学高级医学培训的结构和内容存在很大差异,没有可以比较现有努力的共同框架。我们着手开发一种审核工具,以比较国家之间的培训。对索引和灰色文献进行了初步审查,以开发一种审核工具,该工具被用作基于Internet的修改后的Delphi流程的基础,该流程吸收了来自欧洲各地的14位专家老人的意见。如果分别有> = 75%或<50%的受访者支持,则包括或排除了审计工具中的项目。在第一轮之后,有50-74%的受访者支持的项目继续进行,并提出了其他建议和修改,代表12个国家的13名专家对这两轮做出了回应。第一轮支持40/45个项目,结转了五个项目。在第二轮中引入了另外13项要素以供考虑。最终工具描述了四个领域中的52个项目:一般注意事项,涉及患者护理知识的主题,医学培训中应考虑的不同角色以及评估主题。由此产生的工具可以用作比较国家之间老年医学高级医学培训计划的基础。各个国家可以使用它来审核当前的做法。在欧盟一级,通过此类审核获得的见解将构成今后在该专业开发商定的研究生课程的基础。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号