首页> 外文期刊>Ocean modelling >Comparison of different incremental analysis update schemes in a realistic assimilation system with Ensemble Kalman Filter
【24h】

Comparison of different incremental analysis update schemes in a realistic assimilation system with Ensemble Kalman Filter

机译:Ensemble Kalman滤波器现实同化系统中不同增量分析更新方案的比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

In this paper, three incremental analysis update schemes (IAU 0, IAU 50 and IAU 100) are compared in the same assimilation experiments with a realistic eddy permitting primitive equation model of the North Atlantic Ocean using the Ensemble Kalman Filter. The difference between the three IAU schemes lies on the position of the increment update window. The relevance of each IAU scheme is evaluated through analyses on both thermohaline and dynamical variables. The validation of the assimilation results is performed according to both deterministic and probabilistic metrics against different sources of observations. For deterministic validation, the ensemble mean and the ensemble spread are compared to the observations. For probabilistic validation, the continuous ranked probability score (CRPS) is used to evaluate the ensemble forecast system according to reliability and resolution. The reliability is further decomposed into bias and dispersion by the reduced centred random variable (RCRV) score. The obtained results show that 1) the IAU 50 scheme has the same performance as the IAU 100 scheme 2) the IAU 50/100 schemes outperform the IAU 0 scheme in error covariance propagation for thermohaline variables in relatively stable region, while the IAU 0 scheme outperforms the IAU 50/100 schemes in dynamical variables estimation in dynamically active region 3) in case with sufficient number of observations and good error specification, the impact of IAU schemes is negligible. The differences between the IAU 0 scheme and the IAU 50/100 schemes are mainly due to different model integration time and different instability (density inversion, large vertical velocity, etc.) induced by the increment update. The longer model integration time with the IAU 50/100 schemes, especially the free model integration, on one hand, allows for better re-establishment of the equilibrium model state, on the other hand, smooths the strong gradients in dynamically active region. (C) 2017 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
机译:在本文中,将三种增量分析更新方案(IAU 0,IAU 50和IAU 100)相同的同化实验,采用北大西洋的现实涡流允许原始方程模型,使用该集合卡尔曼滤波器。三个IAU方案之间的差异位于增量更新窗口的位置。通过对热卤素和动力变量的分析来评估每个IAU方案的相关性。同化结果的验证是根据不同观察来源的确定性和概率指标进行的。对于确定性验证,与观察结果相比,集合均值和集合差。对于概率验证,连续排名概率得分(CRP)用于根据可靠性和分辨率来评估集合预测系统。可靠性进一步分解成偏置和分散通过降低的中心随机变量(RCRV)得分。得到的结果表明,IAU 50方案具有与IAU 100方案相同的性能2)IAU 50/100方案优于IAU 0方案在相对稳定的区域中的热卤素变量的误差协方差传播中,而IAU 0方案优于动态变量的IAU 50/100方案在动态活动区域3中的动态变量估计3)如果有足够数量的观察和良好的错误规范,IAU方案的影响可以忽略不计。 IAU 0方案与IAU 50/100方案之间的差异主要是由于增量更新引起的不同模型集成时间和不同的不稳定性(密度反转,大垂直速度等)。较长的模型集成时间与IAU 50/100方案,特别是自由型号集成在一方面允许更好地重新建立均衡模型状态,另一方面,在动态活动区域中平滑强梯度。 (c)2017 Elsevier Ltd.保留所有权利。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号