首页> 外文期刊>Agricultural and Forest Meteorology >Evaluation of the Community Land Model simulated carbon and water fluxes against observations over ChinaFLUX sites
【24h】

Evaluation of the Community Land Model simulated carbon and water fluxes against observations over ChinaFLUX sites

机译:对照ChinaFLUX站点的观测评估社区土地模型模拟的碳和水通量

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

The Community Land Model (CLM) is an advanced process-based land surface model that simulates carbon, nitrogen, water vapor and energy exchanges between terrestrial ecosystems and the atmosphere at various spatial and temporal scales. We use observed carbon and water fluxes from five representative Chinese Terrestrial Ecosystem Flux Research Network (ChinaFLUX) eddy covariance tower sites to systematically evaluate the new version CLM4.5 and old version CLM4.0, and to generate insights that may inform future model developments. CLM4.5 underestimates the annual carbon sink at three forest sites and one alpine grassland site but overestimates the carbon sink of a semi-arid grassland site. The annual carbon sink underestimation for the deciduous-dominated forest site results from underestimated daytime carbon sequestration during summer and overestimated nighttime carbon emission during spring and autumn. Compared to CLM4.0, the bias of annual gross primary production (GPP) is reduced by 24% and 28% in CLM4.5 at two subtropical forest sites. However, CLM4.5 still presents a large positive bias in annual GPP. The improvement in net ecosystem exchange (NEE) is limited, although soil respiration bias decreases by 16%-43% at three forest sites. CLM4.5 simulates lower soil water content in the dry season than CLM4.0 at two grassland sites. Drier soils produce a significant drop in the leaf area index and in GPP and an increase in respiration for CLM4.5. The new fire parameterization approach in CLM4.5 causes excessive burning at the Changbaishan forest site, resulting in an unexpected underestimation of NEE, vegetation carbon, and soil organic carbon by 46%, 95%, and 87%, respectively. Overall, our study reveals significant improvements achieved by CLM4.5 compared to CLM4.0, and suggests further developments on the parameterization of seasonal GPP and respiration, which will require a more effective representation of seasonal water conditions and the partitioning of net radiation between sensible and heat fluxes. (C) 2016 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
机译:社区土地模型(CLM)是一种基于过程的高级陆地表面模型,可以模拟陆地生态系统与大气在各种空间和时间范围内的碳,氮,水蒸气和能量交换。我们使用来自五个代表性的中国陆地生态系统通量研究网络(ChinaFLUX)涡度协方差塔站点的观测碳和水通量来系统地评估新版本CLM4.5和旧版本CLM4.0,并产生可以为将来的模型开发提供信息的见解。 CLM4.5低估了三个森林站点和一个高山草原站点的年度碳汇,但高估了半干旱草原站点的碳汇。落叶林地的年度碳汇低估是由于夏季低估了白天的碳固存,而春季和秋季低估了夜间的碳排放。与CLM4.0相比,在两个亚热带森林站点的CLM4.5中,年度初级总产值(GPP)的偏差降低了24%和28%。但是,CLM4.5在年度​​GPP中仍然呈现出较大的正偏差。尽管三个森林站点的土壤呼吸偏差降低了16%-43%,但净生态系统交换(NEE)的改善是有限的。 CLM4.5在两个草原站点模拟的干旱季节土壤水分含量低于CLM4.0。较干燥的土壤会导致叶面积指数和GPP显着下降,并导致CLM4.5的呼吸增加。 CLM4.5中新的火灾参数化方法导致长白山林区过度燃烧,导致NEE,植被碳和土壤有机碳的出乎意料的低估分别为46%,95%和87%。总体而言,我们的研究表明,与CLM4.0相比,CLM4.5取得了显着改善,并建议对季节性GPP和呼吸的参数化进行进一步的开发,这将需要更有效地表示季节性水的状况和合理的净辐射之间的划分。和热通量。 (C)2016 Elsevier B.V.保留所有权利。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号