首页> 外文期刊>Respiratory care >Aerosol Delivery Through an Adult High-Flow Nasal Cannula Circuit Using Low-Flow Oxygen
【24h】

Aerosol Delivery Through an Adult High-Flow Nasal Cannula Circuit Using Low-Flow Oxygen

机译:气溶胶通过使用低流量氧气的成人高流量鼻腔套管电路输送

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

BACKGROUND: There has been a growing trend toward delivering aerosolized medications using high-flow nasal cannula (HFNC). In some cases, patients who do not require high-flow oxygen to maintain adequate oxygenation may benefit from aerosol delivery while receiving low-flow oxygen via HFNC. The objective of this study was to quantify and compare the relative pulmonary and systemic delivery of salbutamol, with 2 different nebulizers, in patients with COPD receiving low-flow oxygen therapy through an HFNC. METHODS: Subjects were randomized to receive study doses of 5 mg salbutamol nebulized by either a jet nebulizer or a vibrating mesh nebulizer with a T-piece or spacer on days 1, 3, and 5 of admission. Subjects using the large spacer also received 2 puffs (100 mu g each) of salbutamol via a pressurized metered-dose-inhaler prior to the nebulizer dose. Urinary salbutamol excretion 30 min post-inhalation and pooled samples of urinary salbutamol excretion up to 24 h post-inhalation were measured. On day 2, ex vivo studies were performed with salbutamol collected on filters placed between the HFNC and nebulizer, with drug eluted from filters and analyzed to determine inhaled dose. RESULTS: Twelve subjects (6 females), age 51.3 +/- 11.2 y, were included. The vibrating mesh nebulizer demonstrated higher urinary salbutamol excretion at 30 min and 24 h post-inhalation compared to a jet nebulizer (P =.001 and P =.02, respectively). No significant difference was found between the T-piece and large-spacer configurations, even though the spacer provided a significantly larger emitted aerosol dose at the opening of the HFNC (P =.002). CONCLUSIONS: Aerosolized medication could be efficiently combined with low-flow oxygen, via HFNC, in COPD subjects without the need to interrupt the gas supply. The vibrating mesh nebulizer delivered larger doses to subjects compared to the jet nebulizer. However, there was no benefit of using the large spacer with HFNC in low-flow delivery, because the small inner diameter of the HFNC does not allow larger aerosol droplet sizes (preserved by the spacer) to reach the subject.
机译:背景:使用高流量鼻插管(HFNC)提供雾化药物的趋势日益增长。在某些情况下,不需要高流量氧气以维持足够氧合的患者可能会受益于通过HFNC接收低流量氧的气溶胶递送。本研究的目的是量化和比较Salbutamol,2种不同的雾化器的相对肺部和全身递送,在COPD通过HFNC接受低流量氧疗法的患者。方法:受试者随机接受通过喷射雾化器或振动网状雾化器的5mg Salbutamol的研究剂量,或者在第1,3,3天和第5天的T型件或间隔物中雾化。使用大型间隔物的受试者还通过在雾化剂剂量之前通过加压计量吸入器接收2次粉扑(100μg)沙丁胺醇。测量尿Salbutamol排泄30分钟的吸入后和吸入后24小时的尿Salbutamol排泄的汇集样品。在第2天,通过在HFNC和雾化器之间的过滤器上收集的Salbutamol进行前体内研究,该药物从过滤器中洗脱并分析以确定吸入剂量。结果:包括十二个科目(6个女性),51.3岁+/- 11.2 y。与喷射雾化器相比,振动网状雾化器在吸入后30分钟和24小时后显示出更高的尿Salbutamol排泄(分别分别为p = .001和p = .02)。在T型件和大型间隔构型之间没有发现显着差异,即使间隔物在HFNC的开口处提供了显着更大的发射气溶胶剂量(P = .002)。结论:雾化药物可以通过HFNC在COPD受试者中有效地与低流量氧气,而无需中断气体供应。与喷射雾化器相比,振动网状雾化器将较大的剂量递送至受试者。然而,在低流量输送中使用大型垫片的大垫片没有好处,因为HFNC的小内径不允许较大的气溶胶液滴尺寸(由间隔物保存)到达受试者。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号