...
首页> 外文期刊>Rejuvenation research >Cryoprotectant Toxicity: Facts, Issues, and Questions.
【24h】

Cryoprotectant Toxicity: Facts, Issues, and Questions.

机译:冷冻保护剂毒性:事实,问题和问题。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

High levels of penetrating cryoprotectants (CPAs) can eliminate ice formation during cryopreservation of cells, tissues, and organs to cryogenic temperatures. But CPAs become increasingly toxic as concentration increases. Many strategies have been attempted to overcome the problem of eliminating ice while minimizing toxicity, such as attempting to optimize cooling and warming rates, or attempting to optimize time of adding individual CPAs during cooling. Because strategies currently used are not adequate, CPA toxicity remains the greatest obstacle to cryopreservation. CPA toxicity stands in the way of cryogenic cryopreservation of human organs, a procedure that has the potential to save many lives. This review attempts to describe what is known about CPA toxicity, theories of CPA toxicity, and strategies to reduce CPA toxicity. Critical analysis and suggestions are also included.
机译:高水平的渗透冷冻保护剂(CPA)可以在冷冻保存细胞,组织和器官到低温温度期间消除冰形成。 但CPA变得越来越有毒,因为浓度增加。 已经尝试克服许多策略来克服消除冰的问题,同时最小化毒性,例如试图优化冷却和加热速率,或者试图在冷却期间优化添加单个CPA的时间。 由于目前使用的策略不足,因此CPA毒性仍然是冷冻保存的最大障碍。 CPA毒性妨碍了人体器官的低温冷冻保存的方式,这是一种有可能拯救许多生命的程序。 本综述尝试描述CPA毒性,CPA理论的知识,CPA毒性的理论和降低CPA毒性的策略。 还包括关键分析和建议。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号