首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Rejuvenation Research >Cryoprotectant Toxicity: Facts Issues and Questions
【2h】

Cryoprotectant Toxicity: Facts Issues and Questions

机译:防冻剂毒性:事实问题和问题

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

High levels of penetrating cryoprotectants (CPAs) can eliminate ice formation during cryopreservation of cells, tissues, and organs to cryogenic temperatures. But CPAs become increasingly toxic as concentration increases. Many strategies have been attempted to overcome the problem of eliminating ice while minimizing toxicity, such as attempting to optimize cooling and warming rates, or attempting to optimize time of adding individual CPAs during cooling. Because strategies currently used are not adequate, CPA toxicity remains the greatest obstacle to cryopreservation. CPA toxicity stands in the way of cryogenic cryopreservation of human organs, a procedure that has the potential to save many lives. This review attempts to describe what is known about CPA toxicity, theories of CPA toxicity, and strategies to reduce CPA toxicity. Critical analysis and suggestions are also included.
机译:高含量的渗透性防冻剂(CPA)可以消除在将细胞,组织和器官冷冻保存至低温时的结冰现象。但是随着浓度的增加,CPA的毒性越来越大。已经尝试了许多策略来克服在消除冰的同时将毒性最小化的问题,例如尝试优化冷却和升温速率,或者尝试优化在冷却期间添加单个CPA的时间。由于当前使用的策略还不够,因此CPA毒性仍然是冷冻保存的最大障碍。 CPA毒性阻碍了人体器官的低温冷冻保存,这种程序有可能挽救许多生命。本文试图描述有关CPA毒性的知识,CPA毒性的理论以及降低CPA毒性的策略。批判性分析和建议也包括在内。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号