>This study examines the determinants of the subsidiary modes of overseas research and development (R&D) '/> What factors determine the subsidiary mode of overseas R&D by developing‐country MNEs? Empirical evidence from Chinese subsidiaries abroad
首页> 外文期刊>R & D Management: Research and Development Management >What factors determine the subsidiary mode of overseas R&D by developing‐country MNEs? Empirical evidence from Chinese subsidiaries abroad
【24h】

What factors determine the subsidiary mode of overseas R&D by developing‐country MNEs? Empirical evidence from Chinese subsidiaries abroad

机译:什么因素通过发展中国家MNES确定海外研发的附属模式? 来自国外中国子公司的经验证据

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

>This study examines the determinants of the subsidiary modes of overseas research and development (R&D) by Chinese multinational enterprises (MNEs). Based on resource‐based view and absorptive capabilities, we propose that financial resources and technological resources have different effects on the selection of overseas R&D subsidiary modes, which are competence‐exploiting mode or competence‐creating mode. This is supported by the empirical results in this paper using data from a survey of 40 Chinese overseas R&D subsidiaries. The results demonstrate that the parent firms with richer financial resources and more R&D expenses prefer the competence‐exploiting mode, while the parent firms with more R&D personnel favor the competence‐creating mode. Additionally, this study finds that firms matching our mode choice model tend to enjoy a higher level of innovative performance.
机译: 本研究审查了中国跨国企业(MNES)的海外研究和开发(R&& d)附属方式的决定因素。基于基于资源的视图和吸收能力,我们建议金融资源和技术资源对海外R& D辅助模式的选择不同,这是能力利用模式或能力创建模式。这篇论文中的经验结果支持了40个中国海外R& D子公司的调查。结果表明,母公司拥有丰富的财政资源和更多的R&& D费用更喜欢竞争力的开发模式,而母公司拥有更多R& D人员赞成竞争力创造模式。此外,本研究发现,与我们的模式选择模型相匹配的公司往往享受更高水平的创新性能。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号