...
首页> 外文期刊>Lung cancer: Journal of the International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer >Cost-utility analysis of a potential lung cancer screening program for a high-risk population in Germany: A modelling approach
【24h】

Cost-utility analysis of a potential lung cancer screening program for a high-risk population in Germany: A modelling approach

机译:德国高危人群潜在肺癌筛查计划的成本实用性分析:一种建模方法

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

BackgroundLung cancer is the leading cause of cancer death in Germany. Although several randomized trials in Europe have evaluated the effectiveness of lung cancer screening programs, evidence on the cost-effectiveness of lung cancer screening is scarce. ObjectiveTo evaluate the cost-effectiveness of a population-based lung cancer screening program from the perspective of a German payer. MethodsWe conducted a cost-effectiveness analysis from the public payer perspective for a high-risk population defined as heavy former and current smokers (≥20 cigarettes per day) between 55 and 75 years of age. The underlying model consisted of two Markov models. We differentiated between a population-based annual screening program and standard clinical care. Depending on stage at diagnosis, simulated patients were assigned to one of five treatment paths according to the German clinical guideline for the diagnosis and treatment of lung cancer. Costs, life years saved, and quality adjusted life years (QALYs) were used as outcomes. Values for input parameters were taken from the literature. The model was run for 60 cycles with a cycle length of three months. Deterministic and probabilistic sensitivity analyses were conducted. ResultsIn the base case, annual lung cancer screening led to an increase in incremental costs (€ 1,153 per person) compared to standard clinical care. However, the screening approach was associated with an incremental gain in life years (0.06 per person) and QALYs (0.04 per person). Thus, the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) was € 19,302 per life year saved and € 30,291 per QALY. A probabilistic sensitivity analysis with 10,000 draws resulted in average ICERs of € 22,118 per life year and € 34,841 per QALY. ConclusionWe provide evidence that lung cancer screening for a high-risk population may be more effective, but also more costly, than standard clinical care from the perspective of a German payer.
机译:Backgroundlung癌症是德国癌症死亡的主要原因。虽然欧洲的几项随机试验评估了肺癌筛查计划的有效性,但有关肺癌筛查成本效益的证据是稀缺的。 ObjectiveTo从德国付款人的角度评估了群体肺癌筛查计划的成本效益。方法网络从公共付款人的角度进行了成本效益分析,以获得定义为沉重的前者和当前吸烟者(每天≥20支卷烟)的高风险人口。底层模型由两个马尔可夫模型组成。我们区分了基于人口的年度筛查计划和标准临床护理。根据诊断的阶段,根据德国临床指南诊断和治疗肺癌的临床指南,将模拟患者分配到五种治疗路径中的一个。节省的成本,挽救生命年份,质量调整后的生活年(QALYS)被用作结果。输入参数的值取自文献。该模型运行60个周期,周期长度为三个月。进行确定性和概率敏感性分析。结果是基本情况,与标准临床护理相比,年肺癌筛查导致增量成本(每人1,153欧元)的增加。然而,筛查方法与生命年份的增量增益(每人0.06)和Qalys(每人0.04)相关联。因此,增量成本效益率(ICER)为每年保存的19,302欧元,每年保存和每QALY€30,291。概率敏感性分析有10,000次绘图导致平均终身符号为22,118欧元,每年均为34,841欧元。结论我们提供了证据表明,从德国付款人的角度来看,肺癌对高风险群体的肺癌筛查可能更有效,但也比标准的临床护理更昂贵。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号