首页> 外文期刊>Land Use Policy >Where to implement local biotech innovations? A framework for multi-scale socio-economic and environmental impact assessment of Green Bio-Refineries
【24h】

Where to implement local biotech innovations? A framework for multi-scale socio-economic and environmental impact assessment of Green Bio-Refineries

机译:在哪里实施当地生物技术创新? 绿色生物炼油厂多规模社会经济和环境影响评估框架

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Graphical abstractDisplay OmittedHighlights?We set scenarios of locating green biorefineries (GBR) with various soil conditions.?We examine socio-economic and environmental effects of different scenarios.?We examine effects on different spatial scales (municipal, regional and national).?Locating GBR in Western Denmark has larger socio-economic gains in general.?Locating GBR in Eastern Denmark could have environmental benefits.Green Bio-Refineries (GBRs) have economic and environmental potentials through changing land use from cereals to grass production and provision of grass-based protein feed for livestock production and other valuable byproducts. However, the potentials are dependent on local conditions of the GBRs, such as land productivity, environmental sensitivity and transport distances for feedstock as well as the regional economy which GBRs are a part of. In this paper, we compare the total (direct, indirect and induced) effects of different location choices of GBRs in Denmark at different (municipal, regional, national) scales ? a key step for decisions about development of GBRs from both investors' and authorities' perspectives. We integrate a local life-cycle assessment (LCA), a geographic information system (GIS) analysis and an economic-environmental input-output (EEIO) based model (LINE) into a common framework (GIS-LCA-EEIO). We show that locating GBRs in Western Denmark, where the soils are primarily sandy and livestock densities are high, generates higher socio-economic gains than in Eastern Denmark, where the soils are primarily loamy and the concentrations of livestock are lower. We conclude by sketching out priority areas for developing GBRs and discuss the policy implications of the results within the context of development of a bio-based economy.
机译:图形摘要块块线灯西丹麦的GBR一般拥有更大的社会经济增益。在丹麦东部的GBR可以具有环境效益。生物炼油厂(GBRS)通过改变谷物的土地利用来实现经济和环境潜力,从谷物到草生产和提供草地基于牲畜生产和其他有价值的副产品的基础蛋白质饲料。然而,潜力依赖于GBR的局部条件,例如土地生产力,用于原料的环境敏感性和运输距离以及GBRS是一部分的区域经济。在本文中,我们比较不同地理选择在丹麦不同(市,区域,国家)尺度的不同地点选择的总体(直接,间接和诱导)效应?从投资者和当局的角度来决定GBRS发展的关键步骤。我们将基于本地生命周期评估(LCA),地理信息系统(GIS)分析和经济环境输入输出(EEIO)的模型(线)集成到共同框架(GIS-LCA-EEIO)。我们展示了在西丹麦定位的GBR,土壤主要是桑迪和牲畜密度高,产生更高的社会经济涨幅,而不是在丹麦东部,土壤主要是荒谬的,牲畜浓度较低。我们通过勾勒出优先领域的发展GBR,并讨论结果在发展生物的经济发展范围内的政策影响。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号