...
首页> 外文期刊>Land Use Policy >Monitoring land governance: Understanding roots and shoots
【24h】

Monitoring land governance: Understanding roots and shoots

机译:监测土地治理:了解根源和芽

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Despite a growing interest among land use policymakers to identify the indicators that measure changes in land tenure systems, little consensus exists about what framework can functionally analyze land tenure systems, and how it should be developed. The existing indicators have mainly focused on measuring the "effects" of land tenure (in)security and often neglected the "causes". Hence, comprehensive monitoring of land tenure systems has been poorly understood and practiced. Given their multifaceted meanings, land and its related concepts have been a challenging issue for policymakers. Accordingly, the overall objective of this paper was to propose a functional and analytical framework on how to study monitoring land governance from roots to shoots through five main studies: i) understanding the historical trajectories of land, ii) recognizing institutional arrangements on land, iii) identifying land governance grammar, iv) defining land governance typology, and v) assessing land use changes. In line with this objective, the general research question of this study is how and by whom a monitoring system should be developed. Overall, this study can be considered as a conceptual framework that has been designed to conceptualize, develop, build, and apply a functional and analytical framework for formulating land governance grammar to explain how access to land is governed. Unlike previous studies, this study focuses on both causes and effects of strong land governance (SLG) and weak land governance (WLG). The paper discusses that land governance allows various stakeholders to participate in government decisions and ensures the security of their livelihoods. However, land governance could be either poor or strong depending on the government decision-making process. The paper also concluded that SLG is a precondition for economic growth and poverty alleviation in rural areas of developing countries.
机译:尽管土地利用政策制定者之间越来越兴趣,但识别衡量土地权限系统变化的指标,符合在功能分析土地权限系统的框架中存在的达成共识,以及如何发展。现有指标主要集中在衡量土地保安(in)安全的“效果”,并且往往被忽视“原因”。因此,对土地存款系统的全面监测知之甚少。鉴于他们多方面的含义,土地及其相关概念对政策制定者来说是一个具有挑战性的问题。因此,本文的总体目标是提出如何研究如何从根系射击到射击的职能和分析框架,以通过五个主要研究射击:i)了解土地的历史轨迹,ii)认识到土地上的机构安排,III )确定土地治理语法,IV)定义土地治理类型,v)评估土地利用变化。符合此目的,本研究的一般研究问题是如何以及监测系统的发展。总体而言,这项研究可以被视为概念框架,旨在概念化,开发,构建和应用用于制定土地治理语法的功能和分析框架,以解释如何获得土地的控制。与以往的研究不同,这项研究侧重于强大的土地治理(SLG)和弱土地治理(WLG)的原因和影响。本文讨论了土地治理允许各种利益攸关方参与政府决策并确保其生计的安全。但是,根据政府决策过程,土地治理可能是穷人或强势。本文还得出结论,SLG是发展中国家农村经济增长和扶贫的先决条件。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号