...
首页> 外文期刊>Nutrition Research >An age- and sex-specific dietary guidelines index is a valid measure of diet quality in an Australian cohort during youth and adulthood
【24h】

An age- and sex-specific dietary guidelines index is a valid measure of diet quality in an Australian cohort during youth and adulthood

机译:年龄和性别特定的饮食指南指数是青年和成年期间澳大利亚队列中饮食质量的有效衡量标准

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Measuring diet quality over time is important due to health impacts, but to our knowledge, a Dietary Guidelines Index (DGI) with consistent scoring across childhood/adolescence (youth) and adulthood has not been validated. We hypothesized that a DGI that reflected age- and sex-specific guidelines would be a valid measure of diet quality in youth and adulthood. The DGI is based on the 2013 Australian Dietary Guidelines to reflect current understanding of diet quality and comprises 9 indicators, with a maximum score of 100 points. DGI scores were calculated for participants of the Australian Childhood Determinants of Adult Health study, which included a 24-hour food record during youth (1985, n = 5043, age: 10-15 years) and a 127-item food frequency questionnaire during adulthood (2004-2006, n = 2689, age: 26-36 years). We evaluated construct validity (distribution of scores, principal components analysis, correlation with nutrient density of intakes) and criterion validity (linear regression with population characteristics). DGI scores were multidimensional in underlying structure and normally distributed. Among youth, a lower DGI was significantly associated (P .05) with smoking and with lower academic achievement and socioeconomic status. DGI scores were negatively correlated with energy, sugar, and fat and positively correlated with fiber, protein, and micronutrients. Among adults, a lower DGI was associated with lower education and self-reported health and higher waist circumference, insulin resistance, and total and low-density lipoprotein serum cholesterol. The DGI is an appropriate measure of diet quality in youth and adulthood because higher scores reflect nutrient-dense, rather than energy-dense, intake and discriminate between population characteristics consistent with the literature. (C) 2019 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
机译:随着时间的推移,测量饮食质量是重要的,但由于健康影响,但对于我们的知识,饮食指南指数(DGI)跨越儿童/青春期(青年)和成年期并未得到验证。我们假设反映年龄和性别指南的DGI将是青年和成年期的饮食质量的有效衡量标准。 DGI基于2013年澳大利亚膳食准则,以反映目前对饮食质量的理解,并包含9个指标,最高得分为100分。为成人健康研究的澳大利亚儿童决定因素的参与者计算了DGI评分,其中包括青年期间的24小时食品纪录(1985,N = 5043,年龄:10-15岁)和成年期间的127项食物频率调查问卷(2004-2006,n = 2689年代,年龄:26-36岁)。我们评估了构建有效性(分数分配,主要成分分析,与摄入量的营养密度相关)和标准有效性(与人口特征的线性回归)。 DGI分数在底层结构中是多维结构和通常分布的。在青年中,较低的DGI与吸烟和较低的学术成就和社会经济地位有显着相关(P <.05)。 DGI评分与能量,糖和脂肪和脂肪,与纤维,蛋白质和微量营养素呈正相关。在成人中,DGI较低的DGI与较低的教育和自我报告的健康,腰围,胰岛素抵抗和总和低密度脂蛋白血清胆固醇有关。 DGI是青年和成年期饮食质量的适当衡量标准,因为更高的分数反映了营养密集,而不是能量密集,摄入和鉴别与文献一致的人口特征之间。 (c)2019 Elsevier Inc.保留所有权利。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号