首页> 外文期刊>Notes and Records of the Royal Society of London >Creature features: The lively narratives of bacteriophages in Soviet biology and medicine
【24h】

Creature features: The lively narratives of bacteriophages in Soviet biology and medicine

机译:生物特点:苏维埃生物学和医学中的噬菌体活泼的叙事

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The term 'bacteriophage' (devourer of bacteria) was coined by Felix d'Herelle in 1917 to describe both the phenomenon of spontaneous destruction of bacterial cultures and an agent responsible. Debates about the nature of bacteriophages raged in the 1920s and 1930s, and there were extensive attempts to use the phenomenon to fight infections. Whereas it eventually became a crucial tool for molecular biology, therapeutic uses of 'phage' declined sharply in the West after World War II, but persisted in the Soviet Union, particularly Georgia. Increasingly isolated from Western medical research, Soviet scientists developed their own metaphors of 'phage', its nature and action, and communicated them to their peers, medical professionals, and potential patients. In this article, I explore four kinds of narrative that shaped Soviet phage research: the mystique of bacteriophages in the 1920s and 1930s; animated accounts and military metaphors in the 1940s; Lysenkoist notions on bacteriophages as a phase in bacterial development; and the retrospective allocation of credit for the discovery of the bacteriophage during the Cold War. Whereas viruses have been largely seen as barely living, phage narratives consistently featured heroic liveliness or 'animacy', which framed the growing consensus on its viral nature. Post-war narratives, shaped by the Lysenkoist movement and the campaigns against adulation of the West, had political power-although many microbiologists remained sceptical, they had to frame their critique within the correct language if they wanted to be published. The dramatic story of bacteriophage research in the Soviet Union is a reminder of the extent to which scientific narratives can be shaped by politics, but it also highlights the diversity of strategies and alternative interpretations possible within those constraints.
机译:1917年由Felix d'威尔勒勒斯创造了“细菌的吞噬器”术语,以描述细菌培养的自发性破坏现象和负责任的药剂。关于20世纪20年代和20世纪30年代令人振动的噬菌体性质的辩论,并且有广泛的尝试利用这种现象来对抗感染。然而,它最终成为分子生物学的重要工具,在第二次世界大战后,西方的“噬菌体”的治疗用途急剧下降,但在苏联,特别是格鲁吉亚持续存在。苏联科学家越来越多的西部医学研究,开发了自己的“噬菌体”的隐喻,其性质和行动,并向他们的同龄人,医学专业人士和潜在患者传达了他们。在本文中,我探讨了苏联噬菌体研究的四种叙述:20世纪20年代和20世纪30年代的噬菌体的神秘术; 1940年代的动画账户和军事比喻; Lysenkoist关于细菌发育中噬菌体的概念;以及冷战期间噬菌体发现的学分回顾分配。然而,病毒在很大程度上被视为几乎没有生活,噬菌体叙述一直以英雄的牲畜或“动态”,它诬陷了其病毒性质的日益增长的共识。战后叙述,由Lysenkoist运动的塑造和抗击西方的宣传,有政治权力 - 虽然许多微生物学家仍然持怀疑态度,但如果他们想出版,他们必须在正确的语言中框架批评。苏联的噬菌体研究的戏剧性故事是提醒科学叙述可以通过政治形状的程度,但它也强调了这些制约因素内可能的战略和替代解释的多样性。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号