首页> 外文期刊>Neuropsychologia >Neural responses of in-group 'favoritism' and out-group 'discrimination' toward moral behaviors
【24h】

Neural responses of in-group 'favoritism' and out-group 'discrimination' toward moral behaviors

机译:对群体“偏袒”和外汇“歧视”对道德行为的神经响应

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

People hate being deceived. However, what would it be if lies come from in-group members compared with that from out-group members? In the current Electroencephalography (EEG) study, we recruited thirty-six participants to play a modified estimator and advisor game to investigate the mental and neural processes to lies and truth conveyed by in-group and out-group members. At the behavioral level, lies are less morally acceptable, arose less positive emotion, and made participants distribute less money to the advisor in a dictator game. Meanwhile, participants liked the in-group university more than the out-group university and they thought they were more similar to in-group members than to out-group members. However, there were no significant interactions of group type (i.e., in-group and out-group) and message type (i.e., lies and truth) in the aforementioned behavioral assessments. At the neural level, significant interaction effects were found in the parietal N1 and P3 amplitude. More importantly, no significant N1 and P3 amplitude differences between in-group lies and truth were found, while outgroup lies elicited larger P3 amplitude than outgroup truth and out-group truth elicited larger N1 amplitude than outgroup lies. What's more, P3 amplitude differences between lies vs. truth positively correlated with fairness scores only in the in-group condition but not in the out-group condition. Current study showed that the P3 component was sensitive in capturing subtle differences when participants were processing different types of lies and truth that could not be captured by behavioral measurements. Besides, the fairness trait modulated the in-group bias related P3 patterns. The current study provides insight into the neurobiological mechanism underlying the mental process of in-group and out-group lies and truth, and suggests individuals' tendency of general in-group favoritism and out-group discrimination toward moral behaviors.
机译:人们讨厌被欺骗。但是,如果谎言来自集体成员,那么与小组成员相比,它会是什么?在目前的脑电图(EEG)研究中,我们招募了三十六名参与者来发挥修改的估计人和顾问游戏,以调查由集团内和遗弃集团成员传达的精神和神经过程和神经过程。在行为水平,谎言不太可接受,出现不太积极的情绪,并使参与者在独裁游戏中向顾问分发较少的资金。与此同时,参与者比集团的大学更喜欢集团的大学,他们认为他们与小组成员更相似,而不是出于小组成员。然而,在上述行为评估中,组类型(即组和out-group)和消息类型(即,谎言和真理)没有显着的相互作用。在神经层面,在顶叶N1和P3振幅中发现了显着的相互作用效应。更重要的是,发现了内部谎言和真相之间没有显着的N1和P3振幅差异,而OffGroup呈较大的P3幅度被引出,而不是小组的真理和out-Group的真理引起的较大的N1振幅而不是除孔窗口。更重要的是,Lies与真相之间的P3幅度差异仅在群体内部条件下与公平分数正相关,但不在群体条件下。目前的研究表明,当参与者处理不同类型的谎言和真理时,P3组分在捕获微妙差异时对无法被行为测量捕获的不同类型而敏感。此外,公平性状调制了群体偏置相关P3模式。目前的研究提供了洞察力过程中的神经生物学机制,介绍了谎言和实话的心理过程,并提出了个体群体偏袒的倾向和对道德行为的群体歧视。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号