首页> 外文期刊>Natural hazards and earth system sciences >Investigating compound flooding in an estuary using hydrodynamic modelling: a case study from the Shoalhaven River, Australia
【24h】

Investigating compound flooding in an estuary using hydrodynamic modelling: a case study from the Shoalhaven River, Australia

机译:使用流体动力学建模调查河口中的复合洪水 - 澳大利亚浅滩河的案例研究

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Many previous modelling studies have considered storm-tide and riverine flooding independently, even though joint-probability analysis highlighted significant dependence between extreme rainfall and extreme storm surges in estuarine environments. This study investigates compound flooding by quantifying horizontal and vertical differences in coastal flood risk estimates resulting from a separation of storm-tide and riverine flooding processes. We used an open-source version of the Delft3D model to simulate flood extent and inundation depth due to a storm event that occurred in June 2016 in the Shoalhaven Estuary, south-eastern Australia. Time series of observed water levels and discharge measurements are used to force model boundaries, whereas observational data such as satellite imagery, aerial photographs, tidal gauges and water level logger measurements are used to validate modelling results. The comparison of simulation results including and excluding riverine discharge demonstrated large differences in modelled flood extents and inundation depths. A flood risk assessment accounting only for storm-tide flooding would have underestimated the flood extent of the June 2016 storm event by 30% (20.5 km(2)). Furthermore, inundation depths would have been underestimated on average by 0.34m and by up to 1.5m locally. We recommend considering storm-tide and riverine flooding processes jointly in estuaries with large catchment areas, which are known to have a quick response time to extreme rainfall. In addition, comparison of different boundary set-ups at the intermittent entrance in Shoalhaven Heads indicated that a permanent opening, in order to reduce exposure to riverine flooding, would increase tidal range and exposure to both storm-tide flooding and wave action.
机译:许多以前的建模研究已经认为,即使联合概率分析突出了河口环境中极端降雨和极端风暴潮的显着依赖,也普遍地审议了Storm-idde和河流洪水。本研究通过定量沿海洪水风险估算中的水平和垂直差异来调查复合洪水,从而分离暴风雨和河流洪水过程。我们使用了Delft3D模型的开源版本来模拟洪水范围和淹没深度,由于2016年6月在澳大利亚东南部的Shoalhaven河口发生的风暴事件。观察到的水位和放电测量的时间序列用于强制模型边界,而卫星图像,空中照片,潮汐仪和水位记录器测量的观测数据用于验证建模结果。仿真结果的比较包括和排除河流放电,在模型的洪水范围和淹没深度方面表现出大的差异。仅针对Storm-Tide Dirlation的洪水风险评估核算将低估2016年6月6日暴风事件的洪水范围30%(20.5公里(2))。此外,淹没深度平均低估了0.34米,本地均多高达1.5米。我们建议在具有大型集水区的河口中共同考虑Storm-Tide和河流洪水流程,该地区众所周知,这是极端降雨的快速响应时间。此外,浅层山头部间歇入口处的不同边界设置的比较表明,永久性开口,以减少河流洪水的暴露,将增加潮汐范围和暴露于洪水泛滥和波浪动作。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号