首页> 外文期刊>Advances in skin & wound care >The effect of various wound dressings on the activity of debriding enzymes.
【24h】

The effect of various wound dressings on the activity of debriding enzymes.

机译:各种伤口敷料对清创酶活性的影响。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

OBJECTIVE: To understand the compatibility between the debriding enzymes collagenase and papain, and various wound dressings. DESIGN: The extracts from a silver dressing (Acticoat; Smith & Nephew, St Petersburg, Florida), iodine dressings (Iodoflex and Iodosorb; Smith & Nephew), a pigment-complexed polyvinyl alcohol (PVA) dressing (Hydrofera Blue; Healthpoint, Ltd, Fort Worth, Texas), and collagen dressings (Hydrofera Blue and FibraCol Plus; Systagenix Wound Management, Quincy, Massachusetts) were examined in vitro with collagenase and papain (papain was used in papain-urea debriding agents, no longer available on today's US market). SETTING: All testing was in vitro and performed at Healthpoint, Ltd. PATIENTS: Testing was not performed using human or animal subjects. All in vitro testing was conducted in the lab using artificial wound eschar substrate and other lab equipment. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The main outcome measure was percent collagenase and papain activity lost when combined with each type of dressing tested. MAIN RESULTS: The results demonstrated that the pigment-complexed polyvinyl alcohol dressing and the collagen dressing were compatible with collagenase, whereas the iodine dressings inhibit the activity of collagenase. The nanocrystal silver dressing (Acticoat) caused more than a 50% loss in activity when combined with collagenase. Papain displayed varying levels of inhibition with all dressings tested with the enzyme. The iodine dressings significantly inhibit papain activity, whereas the other dressings exhibited inhibitory activity ranging from 10% to 30%. CONCLUSION: Antimicrobial dressings are widely used for management of wound bioburden. Frequently, they are used in combination with other topical therapeutic drugs, such as enzymatic debriding agents for the removal of wound necrotic tissues. Such combined applications may have greater potential to achieve multiple healing activities simultaneously, including exudate and bioburden management, debridement, and tissue regeneration. Overall, the authors' testing found that collagenase was observed to be more tolerant when used with the dressings tested than papain. These findings merit further exploration in clinical wounds to confirm clinical validity.
机译:目的:了解清创酶胶原酶和木瓜蛋白酶与各种伤口敷料之间的相容性。设计:银敷料(Acticoat; Smith&Nephew,佛罗里达州圣彼得堡),碘敷料(Iodoflex和Iodosorb; Smith&Nephew),色素复合聚乙烯醇(PVA)敷料(Hydrofera Blue; Healthpoint,Ltd)的提取物(德克萨斯州沃思堡)和胶原蛋白敷料(Hydrofera Blue和FibraCol Plus; Systagenix伤口管理公司,马萨诸塞州昆西)在体外用胶原酶和木瓜蛋白酶(木瓜蛋白酶用于木瓜尿素清创剂中使用,如今在美国不再可用)市场)。地点:所有测试均在体外进行,并在Healthpoint,Ltd.进行。患者:未使用人类或动物受试者进行测试。所有的体外测试均在实验室中使用人造伤口焦糖底物和其他实验室设备进行。主要观察指标:主要观察指标是与每种测试敷料组合使用时胶原酶和木瓜蛋白酶活性损失百分比。主要结果:结果表明,色素复合聚乙烯醇敷料和胶原敷料与胶原酶相容,而碘敷料抑制胶原酶的活性。当与胶原酶结合使用时,纳米晶银敷料(Acticoat)导致活性损失超过50%。木瓜蛋白酶在用该酶测试的所有敷料中均表现出不同程度的抑制作用。碘敷料可显着抑制木瓜蛋白酶活性,而其他敷料则表现出10%至30%的抑制活性。结论:抗菌敷料被广泛用于伤口生物负荷的管理。通常,它们与其他局部治疗药物(例如酶促清创剂)结合使用,以清除伤口坏死组织。此类组合应用可能具有更大的潜力,可以同时实现多种愈合活动,包括渗出液和生物负荷管理,清创术和组织再生。总体而言,作者的测试发现,与木瓜蛋白酶相比,与测试的敷料一起使用时,发现胶原酶的耐受性更高。这些发现值得在临床伤口中进一步探索以证实临床有效性。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号