首页> 外文期刊>Neuroepidemiology >Unspecified Strokes: Time Trends, Determinants, and Long-Term Prognosis in the General Population
【24h】

Unspecified Strokes: Time Trends, Determinants, and Long-Term Prognosis in the General Population

机译:未指明的中风:一般人群的时间趋势,决定因素和长期预后

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Introduction: In the absence of neuroimaging, a stroke is typically labelled as unspecified. While the majority of clinic-based stroke research focuses on hemorrhagic or ischemic stroke, in the general population, a substantial proportion of strokes remains unspecified. Objective: To investigate time trends in the occurrence and determinants of unspecified strokes and differences in patient characteristics and survival compared to ischemic or hemorrhagic stroke. Methods: We included 1,546 participants from the population-based Rotterdam Study who suffered a first-ever stroke during follow-up (1990–2016). We calculated the proportion of unspecified strokes per year and compared their characteristics between 3 time periods (1990–1999, 2000–2009, and 2010–2016) using a chi-square test, and furthermore investigated differences between unspecified, ischemic, and hemorrhagic stroke in patient characteristics and survival using age- and sex-adjusted survival curves. Results: The occurrence of unspecified stroke among all strokes decreased from 75% in 1990 to 16% in 2016. Compared to the first time period (1991–1999), diagnosis of unspecified strokes was more often done by nursing home physicians (13 vs. 40%) and unspecified stroke patients had more often dementia (30 vs. 43%) in the last time period (2010–2016). Compared to patients with ischemic or hemorrhagic stroke, patients with unspecified stroke were on average older (84.3 vs. 78.5 years) and had more often physical impairments and dementia. Furthermore, patients with unspecified stroke had a lower survival probability up to 10 years after stroke than those with ischemic stroke. Conclusions: The proportion of unspecified strokes decreased drastically from 75 to 16% in the last decades. Patients who do not undergo neuroimaging and therefore are classified as unspecified stroke represent an older, more frail patient group that suffers more often from multimorbidities and poor long-term prognosis than those who do undergo neuroimaging and are thus classified as ischemic or hemorrhagic stroke.
机译:介绍:在没有神经影像体的情况下,中风通常被标记为未指定的。虽然大多数基于诊所的中风研究侧重于出血或缺血性中风,但在一般人群中,大量比例的抚摸仍未指明。目的:与缺血性或出血性卒中相比,调查患者特征和生存率的未指明中风的发生和决定因素的时间趋势。方法:我们包括从基于人口的鹿特丹研究中包括1,546名参与者,在随访期间遭受了第一次卒中(1990-2016)。我们计算每年未指明的中风的比例,并使用Chi-Square试验比较3次(1990-1999,2000-2009和2010-2016)之间的特征,并且还在未指明,缺血性和出血性中风之间调查差异使用年龄和性别调整的存活曲线在患者特征和生存中。结果:在1990年的1990年的75%到2016年下降的未指明中风的发生降低至16%。与第一次(1991-1999)相比,未指明的中风的诊断更常常通过护理家庭医生(13 vs.在最后一次期间(2010-2016)中,40%)和未指明的中风患者在最后一次(2010-2016)中有更常见的痴呆(30与43%)。与缺血性或出血性卒中患者相比,未指明中风的患者平均年龄较大(84.3与78.5岁),并且具有更常见的损伤和痴呆症。此外,患有未指明中风的患者在中风后的存活概率较低,比缺血性卒中的患者长达10年。结论:在过去几十年中,未指明的中风的比例从75%降至16%。不接受神经影像的患者被归类为未指明的中风代表着较旧的,更多的脆弱患者组,这些患者患有多年大学性和差的长期预后,而不是那些经历神经影像的人,因此被归类为缺血性或出血性脑卒中。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号