...
首页> 外文期刊>Neurobiology of learning and memory >Learning mechanisms underlying threat absence and threat relief: Influences of trait anxiety
【24h】

Learning mechanisms underlying threat absence and threat relief: Influences of trait anxiety

机译:学习机制威胁缺席和威胁救济:特质焦虑的影响

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Graphical abstract Display Omitted Highlights ? Threat absence and threat relief cues become safety signals. ? Threat absence and threat relief induce distinct learning processes. ? Threat relief versus threat absence cues elicit stronger appetitive conditioned responses. ? High anxious individuals show deficits in identifying threat absence. Abstract Impaired safety learning has been proposed asa risk factor for anxiety disorders, but safety can be indicated by either threat absence or threat termination (i.e., relief). Here, we investigated the role of trait anxiety for both kinds of safety learning. Ninety-one participants underwent an acquisition phase during which one shape ( threat CS) predicted a painful electric shock (unconditioned stimulus, US), one shape ( relief CS) followed the US, and one shape ( absence CS) became never associated with the US. In a following extinction phase, the three cues were presented again plus a control shape ( control CS). We found successful threat conditioning as threat CS was rated as more aversive (negative, arousing, anxiogenic and associated with US) than the other cues, and it elicited startle potentiation as well asa larger skin conductance response (SCR). Safety cues were rated equally positive and (non-)anxiogenic, but still lower than control CS, whereas physiologically relief CS elicited stronger appetitive responses (startle attenuation and low SCR) than absence CS. Interestingly, an increase in trait anxiety was associated with a decrease in the differences between absence CS and threat CS responses reflected in contingency ratings during extinction as well as stronger fear-startle responses to absence CS. In sum, physiological responses but not ratings triggered by a relief signal compared to a threat-absence signal, indicated that the former is more appetitive than the latter. Strikingly, trait anxiety specifically mediated learning of threat absence, but not of threat termination, indicating that high trait anxious individuals experience relief normally, but have deficits in identifying signals of threat absence.
机译:图形抽象显示省略了亮点?威胁缺席和威胁救济线索成为安全信号。还威胁缺席和威胁救济诱导了不同的学习过程。还威胁救济与威胁缺席提示引发更强大的快乐条件反应。还高焦虑的人表现出识别威胁缺席的赤字。摘要提出了焦虑障碍的危险因素的安全学习,但安全可以通过威胁缺席或威胁终止(即,救济)来表明安全。在这里,我们调查了特质焦虑对两种安全学习的作用。九十一位参与者接受了一个形状(威胁Cs)预测痛苦的电击(无条件刺激,美国),一种形状(浮雕Cs),以及一种形状(缺席CS)从未与之相关联我们。在以下消光阶段中,再次呈现三个线索加上对照形状(对照CS)。我们发现成功的威胁调节,因为威胁CS被评为比其他提示更令人厌恶(负,唤起,焦虑和与我们相关),并且它引发了惊人的趋势以及较大的皮肤导电反应(SCR)。安全性提示被评为同样阳性和(非)焦炭发生,但仍然低于对照CS,而生理浮雕CS引发了比不缺陷的Cs更强的食欲响应(惊吓衰减和低SCR)。有趣的是,特质焦虑的增加与缺席CS和威胁CS反应的差异减少,反映在灭绝期间的应急评级以及缺乏CS的更强烈的恐惧 - 惊吓响应。总而言之,与威胁不存在信号相比,浮雕信号触发的生理反应,表明前者比后者更加令人垂涎。令人惊讶的是,特质焦虑特别是介导的威胁缺席的学习,但不是威胁终止,表明高特质焦虑的人正常经历救济,但在识别威胁缺席的信号方面存在赤字。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号