...
首页> 外文期刊>Natural Gas and Electricity. >Must FERC Weigh GHG Emissions in Pipeline Reviews?
【24h】

Must FERC Weigh GHG Emissions in Pipeline Reviews?

机译:必须FERC在管道评论中称重温室气体排放量?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

> In U.S. Department of Transportation v. Public Citizen, the Supreme Court established an important limiting principle under the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) on the extent to which a federal agency must consider indirect environmental effects in completing NEPA‐required reviews of planned agency action. It held that unless an agency has statutory authority categorically to prevent a particular environmental effect, its order cannot be viewed as a legally relevant cause of that effect, thus relieving it of any obligation to gather or consider information on the effect.
机译: >在 U.S中。 公共公民,“最高法院”公共公民诉讼,最高法院在国家环境政策法案(NEPA)下建立了一个重要的限制原则,联邦机构必须考虑在完成NEPA审查方面的间接环境影响 代理行动。 它认为,除非原子能机构有法定权威,除非是防止特定的环境效应,否则其命令不能被视为对该效应的合法相关原因,从而减轻了收集或考虑有关效果信息的义务。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号