首页> 外文期刊>Kybernetes: The International Journal of Systems & Cybernetics >Owning one's epistemology in religious studies research methodology
【24h】

Owning one's epistemology in religious studies research methodology

机译:在宗教研究中拥有一个人的认识论研究方法

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Purpose There is a lack of epistemological considerations in religious studies methodologies, which have resulted in an on-going critique in this field. In addressing this critique, the researcher's observer effect needs to be actively accounted for owing to the influence of the researcher's epistemology in the author's research. This paper aims to answer the question of why a researcher should address one's epistemology in the research. Design/methodology/approach Using second-order cybernetics as an approach, observer dependence is exemplified and justified in the context of religious studies research methodology. The research activity is shown as a relational temporal coupling that introduces inter-subjective aspects to the research. The research process is analysed showing the need to provide scope for the researcher's epistemology in one's research. Findings A relational observer-dependent approach to research embraces the epistemology of the researcher and the participants providing equality in the relationship. The research results are thus framed according to the nature of the relationship and are thus not detached. This addresses social justice and reduces troubling truth claims. Research limitations/implications This first paper focuses on the question of why epistemology should be included in scholarly research. A detailed framework for how scholars may achieve this goal is to be part of the future study and is not presented in this paper. Practical implications In many positivist approaches there is a motivation to hide the researcher; however, recently there has been a move towards including authors in the first person, realising that science is tied to politics, which does not reach its ideals of objectivity. Cybernetics is presented as an approach to addressing the move from "objective" to "subjective" research. Social implications Researchers cannot get into the minds of their participants and thus an authorial privileged presentation by the researcher of the participant's experiences is fraught with epistemological weaknesses. Attempting to own one's own epistemology could address social justice in research by personalising the research and accounting for the observer effect and the inter-subjective attributes of the research relationship. Originality/value The principle of observer dependence in cybernetics is not new; however, a research approach that focuses on the nature of knowing and how this may influence one's research in religious studies is uncommon. It is thus presented here as a viable option to address the critique of epistemologically weak research methodology in religious studies.
机译:目的缺乏宗教研究方法的认识论考虑因素,这导致了这一领域的持续批评。在解决这一批评方面,由于研究人员认识论在作者的研究中的影响,研究人员的观察者效应需要积极占据。本文旨在回答为什么研究人员应该在研究中解决一个人的认识论的问题。设计/方法/方法使用二阶控制论作为一种方法,在宗教研究研究方法的背景下举例说明了观察者依赖性。研究活动显示为关系时间耦合,引入了对研究的主观间方面。分析了研究过程,表明需要为研究人员的认识论提供一个人的研究。调查结果,研究人员和参与者在关系中提供平等的认识论中的关系研究员的认识论。因此,根据关系的性质构成研究结果,因此不脱离。这解决了社会正义,减少了令人不安的真相索赔。研究限制/含义本第一篇论文重点关注为什么要纳入学术研究的原因。学者如何实现这一目标的详细框架是将成为未来研究的一部分,并未在本文中提出。许多实证主义方法中的实际意义存在隐藏研究人员的动机;然而,最近,在第一人称在内的作者举行了举措,意识到科学与政治相关联,这并没有达到其客观性的理想。争论网络是一种解决从“目标”到“主观”研究的举动的方法。社会影响研究人员无法进入他们的参与者的思想,因此参与者经验的研究人员的授权宣言是充满了认识论的弱点。试图拥有自己的认识论可以通过个性化研究和核算的研究和核算和研究关系的主观性属性来解决社会正义。原创性/价值观察者依赖的依赖依赖的网球菌不是新的;然而,一种专注于知识的性质以及如何影响一个人在宗教研究中的研究的研究方法罕见。因此,这里作为一种可行的选择,以解决宗教研究中的认识学性弱化研究方法的批判。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号