...
首页> 外文期刊>European journal of sport science: EJSS : official journal of the European College of Sport Science >You don't need to administer a placebo to elicit a placebo effect: Social factors trigger neurobiological pathways to enhance sports performance
【24h】

You don't need to administer a placebo to elicit a placebo effect: Social factors trigger neurobiological pathways to enhance sports performance

机译:您不需要管理安慰剂以引发安慰剂效果:社会因素引发神经生物学途径,以提高体育绩效

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

The placebo effect is traditionally viewed as a positive outcome resulting from a person's belief that an inert substance is in fact an active drug. In this context, it is often viewed as an intrapsychic phenomenon. However, most placebo effects reported in scientific research result from social interactions. These might be explicit, such as the description and administration of a treatment by a practitioner, or less explicit, for example, the recipient's perceptions of the practitioner's credibility, expertise, or confidence. On this basis, placebo effects are arguably social in origin. Many phenomena in sport are likewise social in origin, from the facilitation effects of a home field crowd or a cohesive team, to anxiety induced by an expert opponent or perceived underperformance. Such social effects have been the subject of research not only in social psychology, but also in experimental physiology. Emergent research in cognitive and evolutionary anthropology suggests that these social effects can be examined as a form of placebo effect. This suggestion is not a speculative position predicated on social and placebo effects sharing similar environmental cues and outcomes, but one based on a growing database indicating that drug, placebo, and social effects operate via common neurobiological mechanisms. In this paper, we examine the theoretical and empirical overlap between placebo and social effects and describe emergent research reporting specific brain pathways activated by socio-environmental cues as well as by drugs and placebos. We do so from three perspectives: the competitor, the teammate, the researcher.
机译:安慰剂效应传统上被认为是一个人认为惰性物质实际上是活性药物的积极结果。在这种情况下,通常被视为一种缺点现象。然而,大多数安慰剂效应在科学研究中报告了社会互动。这些可能是明确的,例如由从业者的处理和管理,或者通过从业者的治疗,或者更少的明确,例如,接受者对从业者的信誉,专业知识或信任的看法。在此基础上,安慰剂效应可以说是社会的原产地。运动中的许多现象都同样是社交的,从家庭田间人群或凝聚力团队的促进效果来看,专家对手或表现不佳的焦虑。这种社会效应一直是研究的主题,不仅是社会心理学,而且在实验生理学中。认知和进化人类学的紧急研究表明,这些社会效应可以被检查为安慰剂效应的形式。该建议不是一个关于社会和安慰剂效应的投机位置,分享类似的环境提示和结果,但基于越来越多的数据库,表明药物,安慰剂和社会影响通过常见的神经生物学机制运作。在本文中,我们研究了安慰剂与社会效应之间的理论和经验重叠,并描述了社会环境提示激活的特定脑途径以及药物和安慰剂的特定脑途径。我们从三个角度来看:竞争对手,队友,研究人员。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号