...
首页> 外文期刊>Metallurgist >Comparative Analysis of the Influence of Fuel Injection on the Energy Intensity and Carbon Footprint of the Blast-Furnace Process
【24h】

Comparative Analysis of the Influence of Fuel Injection on the Energy Intensity and Carbon Footprint of the Blast-Furnace Process

机译:燃料喷射对高炉过程能源强度和碳足迹影响的比较分析

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

The data on the energy intensity, carbon dioxide emission, and end-to-end emission (carbon footprint) for the production of vanadium iron in coke-fired blast furnaces with injection of either natural gas or both natural gas and pulverized coal are presented. Energy intensity is represented by end-to-end process fuel number. Mean values, variance, standard deviation, range of variation of process fuel number, emission, and end-to-end emission of carbon dioxide are calculated using published data on the consumption of coke, natural gas, and pulverized coal in a blast furnace. It is shown that the process with injection of pulverized coal has better performance in terms of energy intensity. Carbon footprint is minimum when injecting natural gas only.
机译:提出了关于能量强度,二氧化碳排放和端到端排放(碳足迹)的数据,用于在具有注射天然气或天然气和粉煤煤的焦炭燃烧的高炉中生产钒铁。 能量强度由端到端处理燃料号表示。 使用公开数据在高炉中的焦炭,天然气和煤粉消耗的公布数据计算了平均值,方差,标准偏差,加工燃料数,发射和二氧化碳的端到端排放的变化范围。 结果表明,通过注射粉煤的过程在能量强度方面具有更好的性能。 仅注入天然气时碳足迹最小。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号