首页> 外文期刊>BJOG: an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology >Collaboration in maternity care: a randomised controlled trial comparing community-based continuity of care with standard hospital care.
【24h】

Collaboration in maternity care: a randomised controlled trial comparing community-based continuity of care with standard hospital care.

机译:产妇护理方面的合作:一项随机对照试验,将基于社区的护理连续性与标准医院护理进行了比较。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

OBJECTIVE: To test whether a new community-based model of continuity of care provided by midwives and obstetricians improved maternal clinical outcomes, in particular a reduced caesarean section rate. DESIGN: Randomised controlled trial. SETTING: A public teaching hospital in metropolitan Sydney, Australia. Sample 1089 women randomised to either the community-based model (n = 550) or standard hospital-based care (n = 539) prior to their first antenatal booking visit at an Australian metropolitan public hospital. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Data were collected on onset and outcomes of labour, antenatal, intrapartum and postnatal complications, antenatal admissions to hospital and neonatal mortality and morbidity. RESULTS: There was a significant difference in the caesarean section rate between the groups, 13.3% (73/550) in the community-based group and 17.8% in the control group (96/539). This difference was maintained after controlling for known contributing factors to caesarean section (OR = 0.6, 95% CI 0.4-0.9, P = 0.02). There were no other significant differences in the events during labour and birth. Eighty babies (14.5%) from the community-based group and 102 (18.9%) from the control group were admitted to the special care nursery, but this difference was not significant (OR 0.75, 95% CI 0.5-1.1, P = 0.12). Eight infants died during the perinatal period (four from each group), for an overall perinatal mortality rate of 7.3 per 1000 births. CONCLUSION: Community-based continuity of maternity care provided by midwives and obstetricians resulted in a significantly reduced caesarean section rate. There were no other differences in clinical outcomes.
机译:目的:测试由助产士和妇产科医生提供的基于社区的新型护理连续性模型是否能改善孕产妇的临床结局,特别是降低剖腹产率。设计:随机对照试验。地点:澳大利亚首都悉尼的一家公立教学医院。样本1089名妇女在澳大利亚大城市公立医院进行首次产前预约之前,随机接受基于社区的模型(n = 550)或基于标准医院的护理(n = 539)。主要观察指标:收集有关分娩,产前,产中和产后并发症,产前入院住院以及新生儿死亡率和发病率的数据。结果:两组之间的剖腹产率有显着差异,社区组的剖腹产率为13.3%(73/550),而对照组的剖腹产率则为17.8%(96/539)。在控制剖腹产的已知影响因素后,这种差异得以维持(OR = 0.6,95%CI 0.4-0.9,P = 0.02)。分娩和分娩过程中没有其他显着差异。社区护理组的80名婴儿(14.5%)和对照组的102名婴儿(18.9%)被纳入特殊护理托儿所,但这一差异并不显着(OR 0.75,95%CI 0.5-1.1,P = 0.12) )。围产期有8例婴儿死亡(每组4例),围产期总死亡率为每1000胎7.3。结论:由助产士和妇产科医生提供的基于社区的产妇保健连续性导致剖腹产率显着降低。临床结局无其他差异。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号