...
首页> 外文期刊>Melanoma research >Lymph node ratio as a prognostic factor in melanoma: results from European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer 18871, 18952, and 18991 studies
【24h】

Lymph node ratio as a prognostic factor in melanoma: results from European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer 18871, 18952, and 18991 studies

机译:淋巴结比作为黑素瘤的预后因素:欧洲研究和治疗癌症18871,18952和18991项研究的研究结果

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

The aim of this study was to assess the prognostic importance of lymph node ratio (LNR) in stage III melanoma after complete lymph nodal dissections. From European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer randomized trials 18871, 18952, and 18991, 2358 patients had full information on positive and examined lymph nodes (LNs) and were included. Cox proportional hazards models stratified by trial were used to assess the prognostic impact of LNR adjusted for confounders on melanoma-specific survival. Optimal cutoff values for LNR were calculated for each LN dissection site (axillary, inguinal, and neck). LNR (= vs. 35%: hazard ratio=1.44, 95% confidence interval: 1.23-1.69) and number of positive LNs appeared to be of independent strong prognostic importance. Dissection sites impacted the optimal LNR cutoff: 35% for axillary, 40% for inguinal, and 50% for neck dissections. Combining these into one high versus low LNR' resulted in a highly significant multivariately adjusted hazard ratio of 1.48 (95% confidence interval: 1.26-1.74). In subgroup analyses, LNR was only significant in advanced disease (American Joint Committee on Cancer stage N2b, N3; IIIC). LNR was most significant for inguinal dissections, followed by axillary dissections, but seemed less useful in neck dissections. LNR is an independent significant prognostic factor in stage III melanom a patients. Our study showed higher than previously reported cutoffs that differed per dissection site. However, because of conflicting results compared with other studies and apparent limited prognostic impact confined to subgroups, the practical use of LNR seems limited. Copyright (c) 2018 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.
机译:本研究的目的是评估在完全淋巴结疏松筛查后III期黑色素瘤中淋巴结比(LNR)的预后重要性。从欧洲的癌症随机试验的研究和治疗组织18871,18952和18991,2358例,患者患有阳性和检查淋巴结(LNS)的全部信息。试验分层的Cox比例危害模型用于评估LNR对黑色素瘤的存活率对混血剂的预后影响。针对每个LN剖析部位(腋生,腹股沟和颈部)计算LNR的最佳截止值。 LNR(& = vs. <35%:危险比率= 1.44,95%置信区间:1.23-1.69)和阳性LN的数量似乎是独立的强烈预后重要性。解剖网站影响最佳LNR截止值:腋生35%,腹股沟40%,颈部剖检的50%。将这些与一个高LNR组合成1个高度,导致具有1.48(95%置信区间:1.26-1.74)的高度显着多变的危险比。在亚组分析中,LNR在晚期疾病中仅重大(美国癌症阶段N2B,N3; IIIC)。 LNR最重要的是对腹股沟剖面,其次是腋窝剖析,但在颈部剖析中似乎不太有用。 LNR是III阶段Melanom A患者的独立显着预后因子。我们的研究显示出比以前报告的截止值不同,截止值不同。然而,由于结果相比,与其他研究相比,局限于亚组的其他研究和表观有限的预后影响,LNR的实际使用似乎有限。版权所有(c)2018 Wolters Kluwer Health,Inc。保留所有权利。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号