首页> 外文期刊>BMC Cancer >The lymph node status as a prognostic factor in colon cancer: comparative population study of classifications using the logarithm of the ratio between metastatic and nonmetastatic nodes (LODDS) versus the pN-TNM classification and ganglion ratio systems
【24h】

The lymph node status as a prognostic factor in colon cancer: comparative population study of classifications using the logarithm of the ratio between metastatic and nonmetastatic nodes (LODDS) versus the pN-TNM classification and ganglion ratio systems

机译:淋巴结状态是结肠癌的预后因素:使用转移和非转移淋巴结(LODDS)之比与pN-TNM分类和神经节比率系统的对数进行分类的比较人群研究

获取原文
           

摘要

pN stage in the TNM classification has been the “gold standard” for lymph node staging of colorectal carcinomas, but this system recommends collecting at least 12 lymph nodes for the staging to be reliable. However, new prognostic staging systems have been devised, such as the ganglion quotients or lymph node ratios and natural logarithms of the lymph node odds methods. The aim of this study was to establish and validate the predictive and prognostic ability of the lymph node ratios and natural logarithms of the lymph node odds staging systems and to compare them to the pN nodal classification of the TNM system in a population sample of patients with colon cancer. A multicentric population study between January 2004 and December 2007. The inclusion criteria were that the patients were: diagnosed with colon cancer, undergoing surgery with curative intent, and had a complete anatomopathological report. We excluded patients with cancer of the rectum or caecal appendix with metastases at diagnosis. Survival analysis was performed using the Kaplan–Meier actuarial method and the Log-Rank test was implemented to estimate the differences between groups in terms of overall survival and disease-free survival. Multivariate survival analysis was performed using Cox regression. We analysed 548 patients. For the overall survival, the lymph node ratios and natural logarithms of the lymph node odds curves were easier to discriminate because their separation was clearer and more balanced. For disease-free survival, the discrimination between the pN0 and pN1 groups was poor, but this phenomenon was adequately corrected for the lymph node ratios and natural logarithms of the lymph node odds curves which could be sufficiently discriminated to be able to estimate the survival prognosis. Lymph node ratios and natural logarithms of the lymph node odds techniques can more precisely differentiate risk subgroups from within the pN groups. Of the three methods tested in this study, the natural logarithms of the lymph node odds was the most accurate for staging non-metastatic colon cancer. Thus helping to more precisely adjust and individualise the indication for adjuvant treatments in these patients.
机译:TNM分类中的pN分期一直是结直肠癌淋巴结分期的“金标准”,但该系统建议收集至少12个淋巴结以确保分期可靠。然而,已经设计了新的预后分期系统,例如神经节商或淋巴结比率和淋巴结优势比方法的自然对数。这项研究的目的是建立并验证淋巴结赔率分期系统的淋巴结比率和自然对数的预测和预后能力,并将其与TNM系统的pN淋巴结分类进行比较。结肠癌。在2004年1月至2007年12月之间进行的一项多中心人群研究。纳入标准为:这些患者被诊断为结肠癌,正在接受根治性手术,并具有完整的解剖病理学报告。我们排除了直肠癌或盲肠阑尾癌伴转移灶的患者。使用Kaplan-Meier精算方法进行了生存分析,并进行了Log-Rank检验来估计两组之间在总体生存和无病生存方面的差异。使用Cox回归进行多变量生存分析。我们分析了548例患者。对于总体生存,由于它们的分离更清晰,更平衡,因此更易于区分淋巴结比值曲线的淋巴结比率和自然对数。对于无病生存期,pN0和pN1组之间的区别很差,但是这种现象已被淋巴结比率和淋巴结几率曲线的自然对数充分校正,可以充分区分以估计生存预后。淋巴结几率技术的淋巴结比率和自然对数可以更准确地区分pN组中的危险亚组。在这项研究中测试的三种方法中,淋巴结几率的自然对数对于分期非转移性结肠癌最准确。因此,有助于更精确地调整和个性化这些患者的辅助治疗适应症。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号