...
首页> 外文期刊>Medicine, health care, and philosophy >Wrongful genetic connection: neither blood of my blood, nor flesh of my flesh
【24h】

Wrongful genetic connection: neither blood of my blood, nor flesh of my flesh

机译:错误的遗传联系:血液缺血,也不是我肉体的肉

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

The use of reproductive techniques and the eventual reproductive negligence from the provider of reproductive services gave rise to situations in which the intended parents are deprived of raising a child genetically connected to them. Courts have been dealing with cases of those for years, but have systemically denied claimants (the prospective parents) compensation, failing to recognise as damage the loss of genetic connection. In 2017, for the first time, the Singapore High Court provided compensation for that damage, labelled "loss of genetic affinity" (ACB v Thomson Medical Pte Ltd and Others [2017] SGCA 20). This paper will argue that the damage in question is the loss of genetic connection (wrongful genetic connection) and results from a violation of reproductive rights (and eventually also the right to found a family) because a key element of reproductive rights is to have children with whom we keep a genetic bond and raise them. The paper will explain why the arguments classically argued against such compensation are unfounded and it will argue for a compensation covering both patrimonial and non-patrimonial damages.
机译:使用生殖技术的使用和生殖服务提供者的最终生殖疏忽使预期父母被剥夺了培养遗传与他们的儿童的情况。法院一直在处理多年的案件,但具有全身拒绝索赔人(未来的父母)赔偿,未能承认遗传联系的损失。 2017年,新加坡高等法院首次为该损害提供了赔偿,标明“遗传亲和力”(ACB v Thomson Medical Pte Ltd等[2017] SGCA 20)。本文将争辩说,有问题的损害是遗传联系(错误的遗传联系)和侵犯生殖权利的结果(并最终也有权找到一个家庭),因为生殖权利的关键因素是生孩子我们与谁保留遗传债券并提高它们。本文将解释为什么经典争辩地反对此类赔偿的论据是毫无根据的,它将争辩涵盖委托人和非委托赔偿金。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号