...
首页> 外文期刊>Medical teacher >Risk factors for a delay in medical education: Results of an online survey among four German medical schools
【24h】

Risk factors for a delay in medical education: Results of an online survey among four German medical schools

机译:医学教育延迟的危险因素:四所德国医学院的在线调查结果

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Background: Delayed study progress in medical school is a challenging issue for the tax paying community, the faculty and the medical students themselves. Reasons for a delay might be different from known risk factors for academic difficulties.Methods: An online survey regarding delays in the study progress and including a personality test (BFI-10) was presented to medical students from four German medical schools after completion of their 3rd year of study.Results: Of 617 students, 51.2% reported a mean delay of 2.11.5 semesters. Frequent risk factors were secondary employment (69.5%, odds ratio (OR) 1.7, p=0.004), female gender (69.8%, OR 1.6, p=0.007), work or study abroad (35.9%, OR 1.5, p=0.02), a late graduation (5.9%, OR 2.4, p=0.02), as well as support through scholarship or mentoring (19.9%, OR 1.8, p=0.004). Working on doctoral thesis (11.3%, OR 1.9, p=0.03) and structural curricular issues (36.6%, OR 0.9, p=0.7) were frequently identified as obstacles. Support by friends/family was considered helpful by 24.1% (OR 1.4, p=0.09), as well as a high intrinsic motivation (19.1%, OR 0.5, p=0.01). In the BFI-10, students with study delay were more prone to openness and agreeableness.Conclusions: Risk factors for delay are not identical to those for academic difficulties. To decrease the risk for delays, firm curricular structures should be identified and alleviated. Intrinsic motivation is a strong impetus of study progress and additionally might be strengthened by curricular changes.
机译:背景:医学院的延迟研究进展是税务界,教师和医学生身的税收问题。延迟的原因可能与学术困难的已知风险因素不同。第三年的学习。结果:617名学生,51.2%报告的2.11.5学期的平均延误。频繁的危险因素是二级就业(69.5%,赔率比(或)1.7,P = 0.004),女性性别(69.8%,或1.6,P = 0.007),在国外工作或学习(35.9%,或1.5,P = 0.02 ),较晚的毕业(5.9%,或2.4,P = 0.02),以及通过奖学金或指导(19.9%,或1.8,P = 0.004)的支持。探讨(11.3%,或1.9,p = 0.03)和结构课程问题(36.6%,或0.9,p = 0.7)经常被鉴定为障碍。朋友/家庭的支持被认为是有帮助的24.1%(或1.4,p = 0.09),以及高内在动机(19.1%,或0.5,p = 0.01)。在BFI-10中,研究延迟的学生更容易发生开放性和协议。结论:延迟的风险因素与学术困难的危险因素与那些相同。为了减少延误风险,应识别并减轻坚固的课程结构。内在动机是研究进展的强大动力,并且课程变化可能会加强。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Medical teacher》 |2018年第1期|共5页
  • 作者单位

    Martin Luther Univ Halle Wittenberg Dept Internal Med 1 Halle Germany;

    Ludwig Maximilians Univ Munchen Univ Hosp Inst Med Educ Munich Germany;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类 医药、卫生;
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号