首页> 外文期刊>Maturitas: International Journal for the Study of the Climacteric >Herbal medicine (Danggui Shaoyao San) for treating primary dysmenorrhea: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
【24h】

Herbal medicine (Danggui Shaoyao San) for treating primary dysmenorrhea: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

机译:草药(Danggui Shaoyao San)治疗原发性痛经:随机对照试验的系统评价和荟萃分析

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

Danggui Shaoyao San (DSS), a traditional herbal prescription, has long been used to treat menopause related symptoms, including dysmenorrhea. We conducted a systematic review of randomized controlled trials to evaluate the efficacy of DSS for dysmenorrhea. We searched the following electronic databases through October 2015: PubMed; EMBASE; the Cochrane Library; AMED; five Korean databases (KoreaMed, DBPIA, OASIS, RISS, and KISS); three Chinese databases (CNKI, Wan Fang Database, and VIP), and one Japanese database (CiNii). The Cochrane criteria were used to assess the risk of bias for the individual studies. All randomized clinical trials (RCTs) of DSS or modified DSS were included. Data from all articles were extracted by two independent reviewers. Meta-analysis was used to pool the data. A total of 746 potentially relevant studies were identified, and four RCTs met our inclusion criteria. All of the included RCTs had a high risk of bias across their domains. Three RCTs showed favourable effects of DSS on response rate compared with conventional medicine, and a meta-analysis showed that DSS had superior effects compared to analgesics (RR: 1.31, 95%CI, 1.06-1.63, I-2 = 73%). One RCT showed a beneficial effect of DSS on pain compared with placebo control. Our systematic review and meta-analysis provided suggestive evidence of the superiority of DSS over analgesics or placebo for dysmenorrhea. The quality of evidence for this finding was low to moderate because of a high risk of bias. (C) 2015 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.
机译:Danggui Shaoyao San(DSS)是一种传统的草药处方,长期以来一直用于治疗更年期相关症状,包括痛经。我们对随机对照试验进行了系统审查,以评估DSS对痛经的疗效。我们在2015年10月搜索了以下电子数据库:PubMed; embase; Cochrane图书馆; amed;五个韩国数据库(Koreamed,Dbpia,Oasis,Riss和Kiss);三个中文数据库(CNKI,WAN FANT数据库和VIP)和一个日本数据库(CINII)。 Cochrane标准用于评估个体研究的偏倚风险。包括DSS或改性DSS的所有随机临床试验(RCT)。来自所有文章的数据由两个独立审稿人提取。 META分析用于汇集数据。确定了746项潜在的相关研究,4个RCT符合我们的纳入标准。所有包括的RCT都有很高的偏见域横跨域。与常规药物相比,三个RCT对DSS对响应率的良好影响,并且荟萃分析显示DSS与镇痛药相比具有优异的效果(RR:1.31,95%CI,1.06-1.63,I-2 = 73%)。与安慰剂对照相比,一个RCT对DSS对疼痛的有益效果。我们的系统审查和荟萃分析提供了DSS对止痛药或安慰剂的优越性的暗示证据。由于偏差的风险很高,这种发现的证据质量低至中等。 (c)2015 Elsevier Ireland Ltd.保留所有权利。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号