首页> 外文期刊>Medicine. >Herbal medicine (Hyeolbuchukeo-tang or Xuefu Zhuyu decoction) for treating primary dysmenorrhea: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
【24h】

Herbal medicine (Hyeolbuchukeo-tang or Xuefu Zhuyu decoction) for treating primary dysmenorrhea: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

机译:治疗原发性痛经的中草药(冰竹补骨汤或血府逐瘀汤):随机对照试验的系统评价和荟萃分析

获取原文
           

摘要

Background: Primary dysmenorrhea is a condition characterized by painful menstrual cramps that usually occurs in the absence of any identifiable pathological condition among menstruating women, with the prevalence estimates varying between 45% and 95%. Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) are considered as a standard treatment for primary dysmenorrhea ; however, the failure rate of NSAIDs is often 20% to 25% and these drugs commonly cause adverse effects. In this review, we investigated the current evidence related to the effectiveness of Xuefu Zhuyu decoction (XZD) or Hyeolbuchukeo-tang , a traditional herbal formula, as a treatment for primary dysmenorrhea . Methods: Literature search was conducted about randomized controlled trials (RCTs) for XZD on primary dysmenorrhea . PubMed, Cochrane Library, Embase, China National Knowledge Infrastructure Database, Oriental Medicine Advanced Searching Integrated System, and other Chinese, Korean, Japanese databases were searched up to December 20, 2017. Two independent reviewers extracted and assessed the data. The main outcome domains were visual analogue scale (VAS) score and response rate. Results: Among 475 publications, 8 RCTs involving 1048 patients were finally included. Methodological quality of included RCTs was relatively low. In 4 add-on design studies, XZD plus western medication (WM) group showed better response rate as compared to the WM sole therapy (relative risk 1.18, 95% confidence interval [1.11, 1.25], P .01). VAS score after the 3rd month of treatment in the XZD plus WM group was also lower than that in the WM group (mean difference –0.45, 95% confidence interval [–0.79, –0.12], P .01). In 4 XZD versus WM design studies, XZD sole therapy showed better response rate than did WM sole therapy (relative risk 1.26, 95% confidence interval [1.06, 1.49], P .01). Conclusion: The existing trials showed a favorable effect of XZD for the management of primary dysmenorrhea . However, the efficacy of XZD on primary dysmenorrhea is not conclusive owing to the small number of studies and the high risk of bias. Large-scale, long-term RCTs with rigorous methodological input are needed to clarify the role of XZD for the management of primary dysmenorrhea .
机译:背景:原发性痛经是一种以月经来潮疼痛为特征的疾病,通常在月经来潮的女性中没有任何可识别的病理状况时发生,估计患病率在45%至95%之间。非甾体类抗炎药(NSAIDs)被认为是原发性痛经的标准治疗方法;然而,非甾体抗炎药的失败率通常为20%至25%,这些药物通常会引起不良反应。在这篇综述中,我们调查了与血府逐瘀汤(XZD)或清凉汤(一种传统的草药配方)作为治疗原发性痛经的有效性有关的当前证据。方法:对XZD治疗原发性痛经的随机对照试验(RCT)进行了文献检索。截至2017年12月20日,已检索PubMed,Cochrane图书馆,Embase,中国国家知识基础设施数据库,东方医学高级搜索集成系统以及其他中文,韩文,日文数据库。两名独立审阅者提取并评估了数据。主要结果域是视觉模拟量表(VAS)评分和反应率。结果:在475种出版物中,最终纳入了8项RCT,涉及1048名患者。纳入的随机对照试验的方法学质量相对较低。在4个附加设计研究中,与WM单一疗法相比,XZD联合西药(WM)组显示出更高的缓解率(相对风险1.18,95%置信区间[1.11,1.25],P <.01)。 XZD加WM组治疗3个月后的VAS评分也低于WM组(均值–0.45,95%置信区间[–0.79,–0.12],P <.01)。在4项XZD与WM设计研究中,XZD单一疗法的疗效优于WM单一疗法(相对风险1.26,95%置信区间[1.06,1.49],P <.01)。结论:现有试验表明,XZD治疗原发性痛经具有良好的疗效。然而,由于研究量少和偏倚风险高,XZD对原发性痛经的疗效尚无定论。需要大规模,长期的,严格的RCT,以阐明XZD在治疗原发性痛经中的作用。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号