首页> 外文期刊>Medical care >State Variation in Quality Outcomes and Disparities in Outcomes in Community Health Centers
【24h】

State Variation in Quality Outcomes and Disparities in Outcomes in Community Health Centers

机译:社区保健中心成果的质量结果和差异的状态变化

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Background:Prior studies have reported that community health centers perform as well as other sites of care, despite serving more vulnerable patient populations. However, there is little prior study of geographic variation in quality outcomes and disparities in outcomes in this setting. Quantifying geographic variation is important so as to target quality improvement efforts and funding and to learn from states where total quality is highest and racial/ethnic disparities are lowest.Objectives:To estimate between-state variation in hypertension, diabetes, and pregnancy outcomes and racial/ethnic disparities in these outcomes for health center patients.Methods:Using data on all US health centers from 2010 to 2014 (N=1047 health centers/year, or 21.2 million patients in 2014), we used linear regression models to estimate adjusted quality outcomes and racial/ethnic disparities in quality outcomes by state for hypertension control, diabetes control, and normal birthweight.Results:We found wide variation in both outcomes and racial/ethnic disparities in outcomes between states for patients seen at health centers. For instance, between states, the mean proportion of patients with hypertension control ranged from 58% to 70% for white patients, from 49% to 64% for black patients, and from 53% to 74% for Hispanic patients (P<0.001). Racial/ethnic disparities in outcomes ranged from negative or nonsignificant in some states to positive in others.Conclusions:Wide variation in health center patient outcomes and disparities in outcomes is observed between states. This variation suggests that policymakers should target funding and interventions to underperforming states, and identify determinants of high quality in higher performing states.
机译:背景:事先研究报告说,尽管提供了更多脆弱的患者人群,但社区卫生中心的表现和其他部门也表现出来。然而,几乎没有先前研究了这种环境中结果的质量结果和差异的研究。量化地理变异是重要的,以便针对质量改善的努力和资金,并从最高质量最高,种族/种族差异的国家学习。目的:估计高血压,糖尿病和妊娠成果和种族的状态变异卫生中心患者这些结果的/民族差异。高血压控制,糖尿病控制和正常出生的国家的结果和种族/民族差异。结果:我们发现了卫生中心患者在各种患者之间的结果和种族/民族差异的广泛变化。例如,在国家之间,白人患者的高血压控制患者的平均比例为58%至70%,对黑人患者的49%至64%,对西班牙裔患者的53%至74%(P <0.001) 。结果的种族/民族差异范围从其他州的消极或无意识到其他态度。结论:在各国之间观察到卫生中心患者结果的广泛变化和结果。这种变异表明,政策制定者应对业务表现提供资金和干预措施,并确定高质量的高质量的决定因素。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号