...
首页> 外文期刊>Mayo Clinic Proceedings >Thirty-Day Readmission Rate in Acute Heart Failure Patients Discharged Against Medical Advice in a Matched Cohort Study
【24h】

Thirty-Day Readmission Rate in Acute Heart Failure Patients Discharged Against Medical Advice in a Matched Cohort Study

机译:急性心力衰竭患者的30天入院率在匹配的队列研究中解除医疗建议

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

ObjectiveTo determine the readmission rate in patients with acute heart failure (AHF) discharged against medical advice (AMA). MethodsWe performed a retrospective analysis using the 2014 National Readmission Database. Patients admitted with a primary diagnosis of AHF were selected. Only those discharged to home and who left AMA were included in the study. The primary outcome was 30-day readmission. We compared the readmission rates among those discharged AMA vs routinely discharged patients using propensity score matching (PSM) to address imbalance in variables between the 2 groups. We matched 3 routinely discharged patients to 1 patient who left AMA. ResultsWe identified 273,489 patients with AHF, of whom 116,869 qualified for further study analysis. A total of 2014 patients (1.7%) were in the AMA group and 114,855 (98.3%) were in the routinely discharged group. After PSM, 6042 routinely discharged patients were matched with 2014 patients from the AMA group. The standard mean difference for each variable was less than 10% postmatching. The 30-day readmission rate among those who left AMA was higher than among those routinely discharged (33% vs 20.1%;P<.001). Heart failure (44.8%) was the most common cause of readmission in the AMA group. Patients who left AMA were more likely to be readmitted to a different hospital compared with those routinely discharged (37.4 vs 23.1%;P<.001). They also had a high rate of leaving AMA during the readmission (18 vs 2%;P<.001). ConclusionPatients with AHF discharged AMA had a significantly higher 30-day readmission rate than did the routinely discharged group.
机译:ObjectiveTo确定急性心力衰竭(AHF)患者的入院率(AHF)放弃了医疗建议(AMA)。方法使用2014年国家读入数据库执行了回顾性分析。选择患有初步诊断AHF的患者。只有那些向回家排出的人和左阿玛被纳入研究。主要结果是30天的入院。我们比较了使用倾向得分匹配(PSM)的排放AMA VS常规排放患者的入院率,以解决2组之间的变量中的不平衡。我们匹配3常规排放的患者到1名留下AMA的患者。结果我们确定了273,489名AHF患者,其中116,869人有资格进一步研究分析。 2014年患者(1.7%)在AMA组中,114,855(98.3%)在常规出院组。 PSM,6042常规排放的患者与来自AMA集团的2014患者匹配。每个变量的标准平均差异低于10%的后匹配。留下AMA的30日入院率高于常规排放的人(33%VS 20.1%; P <.001)。心力衰竭(44.8%)是AMA集团入伍最常见的原因。与常规放电的人(37.4 vs 23.1%; P <0.001)相比,离开AMA的患者更有可能被预约到不同的医院。在再入院期间,它们还具有高速率的放置AMA(18 vs 2%; P <.001)。结论AHF出院AMA的植物具有比常规出院组的30天入院率明显更高。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Mayo Clinic Proceedings》 |2018年第10期|共7页
  • 作者单位

    Department of Cardiology Lehigh Valley Hospital Network;

    Department of Internal Medicine Lehigh Valley Hospital Network;

    Department of Cardiology Lehigh Valley Hospital Network;

    Department of Internal Medicine Lehigh Valley Hospital Network;

    Department of Cardiology Lehigh Valley Hospital Network;

    Department of Internal Medicine University of Tennessee Health Science Center;

    Department of Medicine SSM Health St Mary’s Hospital;

    Department of Internal Medicine New York Medical College;

    Department of Cardiology Lehigh Valley Hospital Network;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类 医药、卫生;
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号