首页> 外文期刊>Flexible Services and Manufacturing Journal >Comparison of optimal buffer allocation in flow lines under installation buffer, echelon buffer, and CONWIP policies
【24h】

Comparison of optimal buffer allocation in flow lines under installation buffer, echelon buffer, and CONWIP policies

机译:在安装缓冲区,echelon缓冲区和Conwip策略下流线最佳缓冲区分配的比较

获取原文
       

摘要

We compare the optimal buffer allocation of a manufacturing flow line operating under three different production control policies: installation buffer (IB), echelon buffer (EB), and CONWIP (CW). IB is the conventional policy where each machine may store the parts that it produces only in its immediate downstream buffer if the next machine is occupied. EB is a more flexible policy where each machine may store the parts that it produces in any of its downstream buffers. CW is a special case of EB where the capacities of all buffers, except the last one, are zero. The optimization problem that we consider is to maximize the average gross profit (AGP) minus the average cost (AC), subject to a minimum average throughput constraint. AGP is defined as the average throughput of the line weighted by the gross marginal profit (selling price minus production cost per part), and AC is the sum of the average WIP plus total buffer capacity plus transfer rate of parts to remote buffers, weighted by the inventory holding cost rate, the cost of storage space, and the marginal cost of transferring parts to remote buffers, respectively. Numerical results show that the optimal EB policy generally outperforms the optimal IB and CW policies. They also show that as the production rates of the machines decrease, the relative advantage in performance of the EB policy over the other two policies increases. When the cost of transferring parts to remote buffers increases, the dominance of the EB policy over the IB policy decreases while the dominance of the EB policy over CW increases.
机译:我们比较了在三种不同的生产控制策略下运行的制造流线的最佳缓冲区分配:安装缓冲器(IB),梯形缓冲器(EB)和CONWIP(CW)。 IB是传统策略,其中每种机器都可以将其存储在其立即在下游缓冲器中产生的部分,如果下一台机器被占用。 EB是一个更灵活的策略,每台机器可以将其在其下游缓冲区中产生的部分存储。 CW是EB的特殊情况,其中所有缓冲区的容量除外,零均为零。我们考虑的优化问题是最大限度地提高平均毛利率(AGP)减去平均成本(AC),但达到最低平均平均吞吐量约束。 AGP被定义为由毛额边际利润(销售价格减去每份生产成本)的行的平均吞吐量,AC是平均WIP的总和加上总缓冲能力和零件的转移率为远程缓冲区,加权库存持有成本率,存储空间的成本以及将零件转移到远程缓冲区的边际成本。数值结果表明,最佳EB策略通常优于最佳IB和CW政策。他们还表明,随着机器的生产率降低,EB策略在其他两项政策上表现的相对优势增加了。当将部件转移到远程缓冲器的成本增加时,EB政策的主导政策在IB政策上减少,而EB政策对CW的主导程度增加。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号