首页> 外文期刊>Gastroenterology >Equivalent Accuracy of 2 Quantitative Fecal Immunochemical Tests in Detecting Advanced Neoplasia in an Organized Colorectal Cancer Screening Program
【24h】

Equivalent Accuracy of 2 Quantitative Fecal Immunochemical Tests in Detecting Advanced Neoplasia in an Organized Colorectal Cancer Screening Program

机译:2分定量粪便免疫化学试验检测组织结直肠癌筛查计划中晚期粪便免疫化学试验的等效准确性

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Background & AimsAlthough different brands of fecal immunochemical tests (FITs) are used for colorectal cancer (CRC) screening, few studies have compared their accuracy in detecting advanced neoplasia. MethodsWe performed a large prospective cohort study within the Dutch national CRC screening program to evaluate 2 quantitative FITs: FOB-Gold (Sentinel, Milan, Italy) and OC-Sensor (Eiken Chemical, Tokyo Japan), from May 2016 through March 2017. We randomly selected 42,179 screening-na?ve individuals (55–75 years old), who were asked to perform both FITs themselves using the same bowel movement. Participants with positive results from 1 or both FITs (≥15 μg hemoglobin/gram feces) were invited for colonoscopy examination (reference standard). Equivalence in detection of advanced neoplasia was evaluated with a predefined margin of 0.15%. ResultsOf 42,179 invitees, 22,064 (52%) participated and FITs were completed for 21,078 participants. Of 2112 participants (9.6%) with 1 or 2 positive results from FITs, 1778 (84%) underwent a colonoscopy. Of all invitees, the FOB-Gold test detected advanced neoplasia (confirmed by colonoscopy) in 610 participants (1.45%) and the OC-Sensor detected advanced neoplasia (confirmed by colonoscopy) in 606 participants (1.44%)—an absolute difference of 0.01% (95% confidence interval [CI], –0.06% to 0.08%). Of the 21,078 participants who completed both FITs, 1582 (7.5%) had a positive result from the FOB-Gold test and 1627 (7.7%) a positive result from the OC-Sensor test (P?= .140). The relative true-positive rate of FOB-Gold vs OC-Sensor in detecting advanced neoplasia was 0.97 (95% CI, 0.92–1.01) and 0.95 (95% CI, 0.87–1.03) for CRC. The relative false-positive rate of the FOB-Gold test vs the OC-Sensor test in detecting advanced neoplasia was 0.99 (95% CI, 0.93–1.05). ConclusionsIn a large prospective study of individuals invited for CRC screening in The Netherlands, we found equivalent accuracy of the FOB-Gold FIT vs the OC-Sensor FIT in detecting advanced neoplasia. These results are relevant for selecting FITs for CRC screening programs worldwide. Dutch National Trial Registry: NTR5874.
机译:背景技术虽然不同品牌的粪便免疫化学测试(适合)用于结直肠癌(CRC)筛选,但很少有研究在检测晚期肿瘤中的准确性比较。方法网络在荷兰国家CRC筛选方案中进行了大型预期队列研究,以评估2种定量配合:FOB-GOLD(Sentinel,Milan,意大利)和OC-Sensor(Eiken Chemical,Tokyo Japan),从2016年5月至2017年3月。我们随机选择了42,179次筛选 - Na?ve个人(55-75岁),被要求使用同样的肠球运动来实现这两个人。邀请1种符合阳性结果的参与者(≥15μg血红蛋白/克肉)进行结肠镜检查检查(参考标准)。评估了检测晚期肿瘤的等效性,预定裕度为0.15%。结果42,179邀请,22,064(52%)参加并配合完成了21,078名参与者。 2112名参与者(9.6%)(9.6%),具有1或2个阳性结果,1778(84%)进行结肠镜检查。在所有邀请中,在610名参与者(1.45%)和610名参与者中检测到的FOB-GOLD测试(通过结肠镜检查确认)和606名参与者(1.44%)检测到的OC-SENSOR检测到的晚期肿瘤(通过结肠镜检查) - 绝对差异为0.01 %(95%置信区间[CI],-0.06%至0.08%)。在完成两个适合的21,078名参与者中,1582(7.5%)的FOB-GOLD测试和1627(7.7%)来自OC-Sensor测试的阳性结果(P?= .140)。在检测晚期肿瘤中的FOB-GOLD与OC传感器的相对真阳性率为0.97(95%CI,0.92-1.01)和0.95(95%CI,0.87-1.03),用于CRC。福福金试验的相对假阳性率与检测晚期肿瘤的OC传感器试验为0.99(95%CI,0.93-1.05)。结论在荷兰邀请CRC筛查的个人对个人的大型前瞻性研究,我们发现FOB-GOLD FIT VS的等效精度与OC-Sensor适用于检测晚期肿瘤。这些结果与全球CRC筛选方案的选择是相关的。荷兰国家试验登记处:NTR5874。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号