...
首页> 外文期刊>BJOG: an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology >Minimising twins in in vitro fertilisation: a modelling study assessing the costs, consequences and cost-utility of elective single versus double embryo transfer over a 20-year time horizon.
【24h】

Minimising twins in in vitro fertilisation: a modelling study assessing the costs, consequences and cost-utility of elective single versus double embryo transfer over a 20-year time horizon.

机译:尽量减少体外受精的双胞胎:一项模型研究,评估了20年内单胎和双胎选择性移植的成本,后果和成本效用。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

OBJECTIVES: To assess the cumulative costs and consequences of double embryo transfer (DET) or elective single embryo transfer (eSET) in women commencing in vitro fertilisation (IVF) treatment aged 32, 36 and 39 years. DESIGN: Microsimulation model. SETTING: Three assisted reproduction centres in Scotland. SAMPLE: A total of 6153 women undergoing treatment at one of three Scottish IVF clinics, between January 1997 and June 2007. METHODS: A microsimulation model, populated using data inputs derived from a large clinical data set and published literature, was developed to compare the costs and consequences of using eSET or DET over multiple treatment cycles. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Disability-free live births; twin pregnancy rate; women's quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs); health service costs. RESULTS: Not only did DET produce a higher cumulative live birth rate compared with eSET for women of all three ages, but also a higher twin pregnancy rate. Compared with eSET, DET ranged from costing an additional pound 27,356 per extra live birth in women commencing treatment aged 32 years, to costing pound 15,539 per extra live birth in 39-year-old women. DET cost approximately pound 28,300 and approximately pound 20,300 per additional QALY in women commencing treatment aged 32 and 39 years, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Considering the high twin pregnancy rate associated with DET, coupled with uncertainty surrounding QALY gains, eSET is likely to be the preferred option for most women aged
机译:目的:评估在32、36和39岁开始接受体外受精(IVF)治疗的妇女中双胚胎移植(DET)或选择性单胚胎移植(eSET)的累积成本和后果。设计:微观仿真模型。地点:苏格兰的三个辅助生殖中心。样本:1997年1月至2007年6月之间,总共有6153名妇女在苏格兰的三个试管婴儿诊所之一接受治疗。方法:建立了一个微观模拟模型,该模型使用来自大量临床数据集和已发表文献的数据输入进行比较,以比较在多个治疗周期中使用eSET或DET的成本和后果。主要观察指标:无残疾活产;双胎妊娠率;妇女的质量调整生命年(QALYs);卫生服务费用。结果:与三个年龄段的妇女相比,DET不仅比eSET产生更高的累计活产率,而且双胞胎妊娠率也更高。与eSET相比,DET从32岁开始治疗的女性每增加一胎活产额外花费27,356英镑到39岁女性的每增加一胎活产额外费用15,539英镑不等。在开始接受32​​岁和39岁治疗的女性中,DE​​T的费用每增加QALY分别约为28,300英镑和20,300英镑。结论:考虑到与DET相关的高双胎妊娠率,以及QALY收益的不确定性,对于大多数

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号