...
首页> 外文期刊>Foot and ankle international >Determining Success or Failure After Foot and Ankle Surgery Using Patient Acceptable Symptom State (PASS) and Patient Reported Outcome Information System (PROMIS)
【24h】

Determining Success or Failure After Foot and Ankle Surgery Using Patient Acceptable Symptom State (PASS) and Patient Reported Outcome Information System (PROMIS)

机译:使用患者可接受的症状状态(通过)和患者报告的结果信息系统(PROMIS)确定脚和踝关节手术后的成功或失败

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Background: As the role of generic patient-reported outcomes (PROs) expands, important questions remain about their interpretation. In particular, how the Patient Reported Outcome Measurement Instrumentation System (PROMIS) t score values correlate with the patients’ perception of success or failure (S/F) of their surgery is unknown. The purposes of this study were to characterize the association of PROMIS t scores, the patients’ perception of their symptoms (patient acceptable symptom state [PASS]), and determination of S/F after surgery. Methods: This retrospective cohort study contacted patients after the 4 most common foot and ankle surgeries at a tertiary academic medical center (n = 88). Patient outcome as determined by phone interviews included PASS and patients’ judgment of whether their surgery was a S/F. Assessment also included PROMIS physical function (PF), pain interference (PI), and depression (D) scales. The association between S/F and PASS outcomes was evaluated by chi-square analysis. A 2-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) evaluated the ability of PROMIS to discriminate PASS and/or S/F outcomes. Receiver operator curve (ROC) analysis was used to evaluate the ability of pre- (n = 63) and postoperative (n = 88) PROMIS scores to predict patient outcomes (S/F and PASS). Finally, the proportion of individuals classified by the identified thresholds were evaluated using chi-square analysis. Results: There was a strong association between PASS and S/F after surgery (chi-square 0.7) for postoperative but not preoperative PROMIS t scores in determining patient outcome for both PASS and S/F. The proportion of patients classified by applying the ROC analysis thresholds using PROMIS varied from 43.0% to 58.8 % for PASS and S/F. Conclusions: Patients who found their symptoms and activity at a satisfactory level (ie, PASS yes) also considered their surgery a success. However, patients who did not consider their symptoms and activity at a satisfactory level did not consistently consider their surgery a failure. PROMIS t scores for physical function and pain demonstrated the ability to discriminate and accurately predict patient outcome after foot and ankle surgery for 43.0% to 58.8% of participants. These data improve the clinical utility of PROMIS scales by suggesting thresholds for positive and negative patient outcomes independent of other factors. Level of Evidence: II, prospective comparative series.
机译:背景:作为普通患者报告的结果(专业人士)的作用扩大,重要的问题仍然存在于他们的解释。特别是,患者报告的结果测量仪表系统(PROMIS)T得分值与患者的对其手术的成功或失败(S / F)相关的结果相关。本研究的目的是表征普罗旺斯T分数的关联,患者对症状的感知(患者可接受的症状状态[PASS]),以及手术后的S / F的测定。方法:此回顾性队列在第三学术医疗中心(N = 88)的4个最常见的脚和踝护身草案后接触患者。通过电话面试确定的患者结果包括通过和患者对他们的手术是S / F的判断。评估还包括PROMIS物理功能(PF),疼痛干扰(PI)和抑郁(D)尺度。通过Chi-Square分析评估了S / F与传递结果之间的关联。双向对方差分析(ANOVA)评估了促进歧视通行证和/或S / F结果的能力。接收器操作符曲线(ROC)分析用于评估(n = 63)和术后(n = 88)普罗基斯分数以预测患者结果(s / f和通过)的能力。最后,使用Chi-Square分析评估所识别的阈值分类的个体的比例。结果:手术后通过和S / F之间存在强大的关联(Chi-Square 0.7),在术后但不是术前促销促销得分,在确定通行证和S / F的患者结果时。通过普罗斯利用普罗斯申请ROC分析阈值分类的患者的比例从43.0%到58.8%的通行证和S / F。结论:在满意的水平(即通过是)的症状和活动的患者也认为他们的手术取得了成功。然而,没有考虑其令人满意的水平症状和活动的患者并未始终考虑他们的手术失败。 PROMIS T分数用于物理功能和疼痛表明,在脚踝手术后歧视和准确地预测患者结果的能力43.0%至58.8%的参与者。这些数据通过建议与其他因素无关的正面和消极患者结果的阈值来改善PROMIS级别的临床用途。证据级别:II,前瞻性比较系列。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号