首页> 外文期刊>Food Policy >Do development projects crowd-out private sector activities? Evidence from contract farming participation in Northern Ghana
【24h】

Do development projects crowd-out private sector activities? Evidence from contract farming participation in Northern Ghana

机译:开发项目挤出私营部门活动吗? 来自合同农业参与加纳北部的证据

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Contract farming (CF) is attractive as a possible private sector-led strategy for improving market coordination and smallholder farmers' welfare. At the same time, governmental and non-governmental development projects aimed at improving farmers' welfare continue to be organized. It is not uncommon for CF activities and development projects to take place in the same communities. Yet so far there is no evidence on how development projects affect CF activities. We examine factors affecting entry in and exit from different maize CF schemes in Northern Ghana, and focus specifically on the role of development projects. We find that the presence of agricultural development projects in the community is associated with lower scheme entry, but this not the case for non-agricultural projects. CF exit is more strongly associated with maize projects, but not significantly with non maize or non-agricultural projects. Thus, our findings do not support concerns of a general moral hazard problem arising from the presence of any development project, but indicate possible negative associations of more closely related agricultural or maize projects with maize CF participation.
机译:合同农业(CF)作为改善市场协调和小农福利可能的私营部门主导策略具有吸引力。与此同时,旨在改善农民福利的政府和非政府发展项目继续组织。 CF活动和开发项目在同一社区中进行并不罕见。然而到目前为止,没有证据表明开发项目如何影响CF活动。我们研究影响北部加纳北部不同玉米CF方案的因素,并专注于开发项目的作用。我们发现,社区中的农业发展项目的存在与较低的计划条目相关,但这并非非农业项目的情况。 CF Exit与玉米项目更强烈,但非玉米或非农业项目没有显着。因此,我们的调查结果并不支持来自任何发展项目的存在引起的一般道德风险问题的担忧,而是表明更密切相关的农业或玉米项目的可能负面关联,玉米CF参与。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号