...
首页> 外文期刊>GPS Solutions >Analysis of Galileo/BDS/GPS signals and RTK performance
【24h】

Analysis of Galileo/BDS/GPS signals and RTK performance

机译:伽利略/ BDS / GPS信号分析和RTK性能

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

New satellites and signals become available with the modernization of GNSS, especially for Galileo and BDS. The current Galileo constellation comprises 4 IOV (in-orbit validation) and 14 FOC (full operational capability) satellites which transmit signals on five frequencies. In addition to BDS-II regional navigation system, five BDS-III experimental (BDS-IIIs) and eight BDS-III satellites have been launched. It is worthwhile to evaluate the performance of these new satellites and signals. First, these signals are assessed in regard to carrier-to-noise density ratio (C/N0), code multipath (MP) combination, and triple-frequency carrier phase ionospheric-free and geometry-free (DIF) combination. The C/N0 of Galileo IOV satellites is several dB-HZ lower than that of the FOC satellites, while that of the IOV satellite E19 is always the lowest, regardless of receiver type. As for BDS, the C/N0 of the BDS-IIIs are higher than that of BDS-II but lower than that of BDS-III. The difference of C/N0 among GPS satellites is not obvious. Among all the signals, the performance of E5 is the best which may be related to its advanced modulation scheme, while the L2 is the worst. The code multipath on E5 is independent of the satellite elevation due to its good MP suppression performance, which may be related to its wide signal bandwidth. The RMSs of MP for Galileo signals are even smaller than that of GPS. Being free of the systematic code errors of BDS-II, the RMS of BDS-IIIs MP errors is comparable with that of GPS and Galileo. In addition, the multipath errors show an obvious periodic behavior, which differs with the types of satellites. Similarly, the DIF combinations also possess elevation-dependent and periodic characteristics. Note that the inter-frequency bias variations present in BDS-II and GPS IIF satellites are absent for Galileo satellites. The accuracy of Galileo SPP is comparable to that of GPS, but better than that of BDS. Although there are no significant differences
机译:新的卫星和信号具有GNSS的现代化可用,特别是对于伽利略和BDS。目前的伽利略星座包括4个IOV(轨道验证)和14个FOC(完全运行能力)卫星,其在五个频率上传输信号。除了BDS-II区域导航系统,还推出了五个BDS-III实验(BDS-III)和八个BDS-III卫星。值得评估这些新卫星和信号的性能。首先,在关于载波到噪声密度比(C / N0),代码多径(MP)组合和无频率载体相位电离层和几何形状(DIF)组合中评估这些信号。伽利略IOV卫星的C / N0是几个DB-Hz低于FOC卫星的DB-Hz,而iov卫星E19的C / N0始终是最低的,而不管接收器类型如何。对于BDS,BDS-III的C / N0高于BDS-II的C / N0,但低于BDS-III的C / N0。 GPS卫星中C / N0的差异并不明显。在所有信号中,E5的性能是最佳的,这可能与其高级调制方案有关,而L2是最糟糕的。由于其良好的MP抑制性能,E5上的代码多径独立于卫星高程,这可能与其宽信号带宽有关。伽利略信号的MP的RMS甚至小于GPS​​的MP。没有BDS-II的系统代码误差,BDS-IIIS MP错误的RMS与GPS和伽利略的RMS相当。此外,多径误差显示出明显的周期性行为,与卫星的类型不同。类似地,DIF组合也具有升高依赖性和周期性特征。注意,伽利略卫星不存在BDS-II和GPS IIF卫星中存在的频率间偏差变化。伽利略SPP的准确性与GPS的准确性相当,但比BDS更好。虽然没有显着差异

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号