首页> 外文期刊>Geriatrics & gerontology international. >Frailty phenotype and its association with all‐cause mortality in community‐dwelling Norwegian women and men aged 70?years and older: The Troms? Study 2001–2016
【24h】

Frailty phenotype and its association with all‐cause mortality in community‐dwelling Norwegian women and men aged 70?years and older: The Troms? Study 2001–2016

机译:脆弱的表型及其与70岁的社区挪威妇女和男性中的所有导致死亡的关联及其与年龄较大的男性:TROMS? 研究2001 - 2016年

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Aim There is a lack of studies on the prevalence of frailty, and the association between frailty and mortality in a Norwegian general population. Findings regarding sex differences in the association between frailty and mortality have been inconsistent. The aim of the present study was to investigate the association between the frailty phenotype and all‐cause mortality in men and women in a Norwegian cohort study. Methods We followed 712 participants (52% women) aged ≥70?years participating in the population‐based Troms? 5 Study in 2001–2002 for all‐cause mortality up to 2016. The frailty status at baseline was defined by a modified version of Fried's frailty criteria. Cox regression models were used to analyze the association between frailty and mortality with adjustment for age, sex, disability, comorbidity, smoking status and years of education. Results In total, 3.8% ( n ?=?27) of participants were frail (women 4.4%, men 3.2%) and 38.1% ( n ?=?271) were pre‐frail (women 45.8%, men 29.9%). During follow‐up (mean 10.1?years), 501 (70%) participants died. We found an increased risk of mortality for frail older adults (multivariable‐adjusted HR 4.16, 95% CI 2.40–7.22) compared with non‐frail older adults. In sex‐stratified analysis, the adjusted HR was 7.09 (95% CI 3.03–16.58) for frail men and 2.93 (95% CI 1.38–6.22) for frail women. Results for pre‐frailty showed an overall weaker association with mortality. Conclusions While frailty was more prevalent in women than in men, the findings suggest that the association between frailty and mortality is stronger in men than in women. Geriatr Gerontol Int 2018; 18: 1200–1205 .
机译:旨在缺乏关于勒布的患病率的研究,以及挪威人群中的脆弱和死亡率之间的关联。关于脆弱和死亡率之间的性别差异的调查结果不一致。本研究的目的是探讨挪威队列研究中男女体育型和妇女的脆弱表型和全因死亡率之间的关联。方法我们遵循712名参与者(52%妇女)≥70岁的人参加基于人口的三年? 5 2001 - 2002年的研究截至2016年的全因死亡率。基线的脆弱地位由修改版的油炸的脆弱标准定义。 Cox回归模型用于分析脆弱和死亡率之间的关联,调整年龄,性别,残疾,合并症,吸烟地位和教育年龄。结果总计3.8%(n?=?27)参与者的勒索(女性4.4%,男性3.2%)和38.1%(n?= 271)是预削弱(女性45.8%,男性29.9%)。在随访期间(平均10.1?年),501(70%)参与者死亡。与非脆弱年龄成年人相比,我们发现Frail老年成年人的死亡风险增加了(多变量调整的人力资源4.16,95%CI 2.4.22)。在性分析分析中,调整后的人力资源为5.09(95%CI 3.03-16.58),适用于Freail Men和2.93(95%CI 1.38-6.22),适用于Frail女性。前脆弱的结果表明,与死亡率的总体较弱。结论,虽然女性在女性中比男性更普遍,但调查结果表明,男性之间的关联和死亡率比女性更强。 GeriaTr Gerontol int 2018; 18:1200-1205。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号