首页> 外文期刊>Geographical Journal >Who still dies young in a rich city? Revisiting the case of Oxford
【24h】

Who still dies young in a rich city? Revisiting the case of Oxford

机译:谁仍然在一个富裕的城市死亡? 重新审视牛津的案件

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

There are substantial inequalities in mortality and life expectancy in England, strongly linked to levels of deprivation. Mortality rates among those who are homeless are particularly high. Using the city of Oxford (UK) as a case study, we investigate ward-level premature standardised mortality ratios for several three-year and five-year periods between 2002 and 2016, and explore the extent to which the mortality of people who become homeless contributed to any rise or fall in geographical inequalities during this period. Age-sex standardised mortality ratios (SMRs) for people aged under 65 years old, with and without deaths among the homeless population, were calculated using Office for National Statistics Death Registration data for England and Wales 2002-2016. Individuals who were homeless or vulnerably housed were identified using records supplied by a local Oxford homeless charity. We found that in an increasingly wealthy, and healthy, city there were persistent ward-level inequalities in mortality, which the city-wide decrease in premature mortality over the period masked. Premature deaths among homeless people in Oxford became an increasingly important contributor to the overall geographical inequalities in health in this city. In the ward with the highest SMR, deaths among the homeless population accounted for 73% of all premature deaths of residents over the whole period; in 2014-2016 this proportion rose to 88%. Homelessness among men (the vast majority of the known homeless population) in this gentrifying English city rose to become the key explanation of geographical mortality patterns in deaths before age 65 across the entire city, particularly after 2011. Oxford reflects a broader pattern now found in many places across England of increasing homeless deaths, widening geographical inequalities in life expectancy, and sharp increases in all-age SMRs. The answer to the question, "Who dies young in a rich, and in fact an even richer, place?" is - increasingly - the homeless.
机译:在英格兰的死亡率和预期寿命存在大量不平等,与剥夺水平密切相关。无家可归者的死亡率特别高。利用牛津市(英国)作为案例研究,我们调查了2002年至2016年期间的三年和五年期间的病房水平过早标准化死亡率,并探讨了无家可归者的死亡率的程度在此期间,在地理不平等中造成任何上升或下降。在65岁以下的人口,无家可归人群中,在65岁以下的人的年龄 - 性标准化死亡率(SMR)是使用英格兰和威尔士2002-2016的国家统计死亡登记数据。无家可归或脆弱的个人使用当地牛津无家可归慈善机构提供的记录来确定无家可归者或易于培养的人。我们发现,在越来越富有的,健康的城市,死亡率存在持久的病房水平不平等,这在蒙面的时期,城市的过早死亡率降低。牛津无家可归者之间的过早死亡成为这座城市整体地理不平等的越来越重要的贡献者。在SMR最高的病房中,无家可归人口中的死亡人数占整个时期所有居民死亡人口的73%; 2014 - 2016年,这一比例升至88%。在这位绅士的英国城市中的男人(绝大多数已知的无家可归人口)中崛起,成为整个城市的65岁以上65岁之前死亡地理死亡率模式的关键解释,特别是在2011年之后。牛津反映了现在发现的更广泛的模式英格兰的许多地方增加无家可归的死亡,加宽预期寿命的地理不平等,并且全年SMR的急剧增加。答案的答案,“谁在富人死亡,实际上是更富有的地方?”是 - 越来越多的无家可归者。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号