首页> 外文期刊>Geographical Journal >Mapping careful epidemiology: Spatialities, materialities, and subjectivities in the management of animal disease
【24h】

Mapping careful epidemiology: Spatialities, materialities, and subjectivities in the management of animal disease

机译:映射仔细流行病学:动物疾病管理中的空间,唯物主义和主观性

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

As a geographical tool, epidemiology represents a distinct way of seeing and knowing disease. Used as a governmental rationality to control animal disease, changes in epidemiological practice have been understood as technological evolutions. In doing so, however, this view disguises the "messy realities" of epidemiology, the relationship between different epidemiological practices, and the work required to make epidemiology "matter." Drawing on a case study of the management of bovine tuberculosis in England and Wales, the paper examines how epidemiological practices are developed, replaced, and contested. By focusing on practices of epidemiological record keeping and mapping, the paper argues that epidemiology arranges different spatialities, materialities, and subjectivities in order to enact the presence of animal disease. The paper tracks changes to these arrangements over time, showing how they seek to redefine the appropriate people, places, and practices that allow disease to be seen. In doing so, however, the paper shows how versions of epidemiology deposit "residues of practice" that influence how new epidemiological arrangements are received and negotiated in use. A central theme to these negotiations is an attempt to accommodate complexity by employing a caring and/or careful approach to epidemiology, as revealed through the practices of "re-recording" and "re-mapping." Whilst this demonstrates the contextual and in-situ nature of epidemiology, highlighting the contribution of a caring/careful epidemiology also serves to make these practices relevant for future iterations of epidemiological practice by making them "matter."
机译:作为地理工具,流行病学代表了一种明显的观察和了解疾病。用作控制动物疾病的政府合理性,流行病学实践的变化被理解为技术演变。然而,在这样做时,这种观点伪装了流行病学的“凌乱现实”,不同流行病学实践的关系,以及制造流行病学的工作“问题”。论文在英格兰和威尔士牛结核病管理案例研究中,研究了如何制定流行病学实践,取代和竞争。通过专注于流行病学记录保持和映射的实践,本文认为流行病学以制定动物疾病的存在,排列不同的空间,唯物主义和主观性。纸张跟踪这些安排的变化随着时间的推移,显示他们如何寻求重新定义允许看到疾病的适当人物,地方和实践。然而,在这样做时,本文展示了影响如何在使用中收到和协商新流行病学安排的流行病学存款“残留”的流行病学存款。这些谈判的中央主题是通过使用关怀和/或仔细的流行病学方法来适应复杂性,正如通过“重新录制”和“重新绘图”的实践所揭示的那样。虽然这证明了流行病学的上下文和原位性质,但突出了关怀/仔细流行病学的贡献也是为了使这些做法与使其“事物”进行流行病学实践的迭代。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号