首页> 外文期刊>Geography and natural resources >Geography of World Economic Relations at the Turn of the 19~(th) Century
【24h】

Geography of World Economic Relations at the Turn of the 19~(th) Century

机译:19〜(Th)世纪之交的世界经济关系地理

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

This article deals with the geographical aspects of international trade and foreign investment at the turn of the 19~(th) century. These issues of historical geography of the world economy are poorly explored in national science. It is shown that the widely held views of the critical importance of the colonies in foreign economic relations of the parent states are unsubstantiated and are not statistically sound. Neither in trade nor in capital investment did the colonies play the role that is often attributed to them. It is established that it is Europe rather than the colonial empires became the main structural element of the world economic system resulting from the industrial and transport-communication revolution. The world economic ties of those times are, in essence, the interrelations between European countries or with the participation of European countries. It is found that the colonial empires were economically open systems rather than closed systems, as is sometimes suggested. The characteristics of the internal structure of the world economic relations are identified. It is shown that raw and materials and food products were dominant in the commodity composition of international trade, whereas the structure of foreign investment was dominated by capital investment in the infrastructure. As far as direct foreign investments are concerned, however (which constituted a relatively small part of capital exports), they were made mainly in the primary sector of the economy. Furthermore, the counter flows of capital, that is, mutual investments of industrially developed countries, were uncommon. It is pointed out that the statement that capital was exported solely to poor and backward countries is misleading. On the contrary, as is established, most foreign investments were made in developed countries, according to the standards of those times.
机译:本文涉及国际贸易和外商投资的地理方面,于19〜(至此)。世界经济的历史地理问题在国家科学方面探讨了很差。结果表明,父母各州的外国经济关系中殖民地的批判性观点普遍存在的观点是未经证实的,并且没有统计声音。殖民地既不贸易也不是资本投资,殖民地扮演往往归因于他们的角色。建立欧洲而不是殖民地帝国成为世界经济体系的主要结构因素,由工业和运输沟通革命产生。这些时代的世界经济联系本质上是欧洲国家与欧洲国家的参与之间的相互关系。结果发现,殖民地帝国是经济上开放的系统而不是封闭系统,有时建议。确定了世界经济关系内部结构的特征。结果表明,原料和材料和食品在国际贸易的商品组成中占主导地位,而外国投资的结构主要是基础设施的资本投资。然而,就直接外国投资而言(这构成了一个相对较小的资本出口部分),主要是经济的主要部门。此外,资本的柜台流量,即工业发达国家的相互投资罕见。有人指出,资本仅为贫困和落后国家出口的声明是误导性的。相反,正如所建立的那样,根据这些时代的标准,大多数外国投资是发达国家的。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号