...
首页> 外文期刊>Geoderma: An International Journal of Soil Science >Predicting soil properties in the Canadian boreal forest with limited data: Comparison of spatial and non-spatial statistical approaches
【24h】

Predicting soil properties in the Canadian boreal forest with limited data: Comparison of spatial and non-spatial statistical approaches

机译:具有有限数据的加拿大北方森林中的土壤性质:空间和非空间统计方法比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Digital soil mapping (DSM) involves the use of georeferenced information and statistical models to map predictions and uncertainties related to soil properties. Many remote regions of the globe, such as boreal forest ecosystems, are characterized by low sampling efforts and limited availability of field soil data. Although DSM is an expanding topic in soil science, little guidance currently exists to select the appropriate combination of statistical methods and model formulation in the context of limited data availability. Using the Canadian managed forest as a case study, the main objective of this study was to investigate to which extent the choice of statistical method and model specification could improve the spatial prediction of soil properties with limited data. More specifically, we compared the cross-product performance of eight statistical approaches (linear, additive and geostatistical models, and four machine-learning techniques) and three model formulations ("covariates only": a suite of environmental covariates only; "spatial only": a function of geographic coordinates only; and "covariates + spatial": a combination of both covariates and spatial functions) to predict five key forest soil properties in the organic layer (thickness and C:N ratio) and in the top 15 cm of the mineral horizon (carbon concentration, percentage of sand, and bulk density). Our results show that 1) although strong differences in predictive performance occurred across all statistical approaches and model formulations, spatially explicit models consistently had higher R-2 and lower RMSE values than non-spatial models for all soil properties, except for the C:N ratio; 2) Bayesian geostatistical models were among the best methods, followed by ordinary kriging and machine-learning methods; and 3) comparative analyses made it possible to identify the more performant models and statistical methods to predict specific soil properties. We make modeling tools and code available (e.g., Bayesian geostastical models) that increase DSM capabilities and support existing efforts toward the production of improved digital soil products with limited data.
机译:数字土壤 - 映射(DSM)涉及使用地理学信息和统计模型来映射与土壤性质相关的预测和不确定性。全球的许多偏远地区,如北方森林生态系统,其特征在于,采样努力和现场土壤数据的可用性有限。虽然DSM是土壤科学的扩展主题,但目前存在的指导较少,以在有限的数据可用性的背景下选择适当的统计方法和模型配方组合。使用加拿大管理森林作为案例研究,本研究的主要目的是调查统计方法和模型规范的选择可以改善有限数据的土壤性质的空间预测。更具体地说,我们比较了八种统计方法的横向产品性能(线性,添加剂和地统计模型,以及四种机器学习技术)和三种模型配方(仅限协变者“:仅限环境协变者套件;”仅限空间仅限“ :仅限地理坐标的功能;和“协变+空间”:协变量和空间功能的组合),以预测有机层(厚度和C:n比)中的五个关键林土特性,并在前15厘米中矿物地平线(碳浓度,沙子百分比和散装密度)。我们的结果表明,虽然所有统计方法和模型配方发生了预测性能的强烈差异,但除了C:n之外,空间显式模型比所有土壤属性的非空间模型一致地具有更高的R-2和更低的RMSE值。比率; 2)贝叶斯地质统计模型是最好的方法之一,其次是普通的Kriging和机器学习方法; 3)比较分析使得可以鉴定更加性能的模型和统计方法以预测特定的土壤性质。我们制作建模工具和可用的代码(例如,贝叶斯地偶数模型),增加DSM功能,并支持现有的努力生产具有有限数据的改进的数字土壤产品。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号