...
首页> 外文期刊>BJOG: an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology >A randomised, double-blind trial comparing raloxifene HCl and continuous combined hormone replacement therapy in postmenopausal women: effects on compliance and quality of life.
【24h】

A randomised, double-blind trial comparing raloxifene HCl and continuous combined hormone replacement therapy in postmenopausal women: effects on compliance and quality of life.

机译:一项随机,双盲试验,比较了盐酸雷洛昔芬和连续联合激素替代疗法对绝经后妇女的影响:对依从性和生活质量的影响。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

OBJECTIVE: To compare continuous combined hormone replacement therapy (ccHRT) and raloxifene with respect to compliance and quality of life, which were predefined secondary endpoints of a large, prospective study designed to investigate the uterine effects of both treatments. DESIGN: Double-blind, randomised controlled trial of six-month duration. SETTING: One hundred and twenty-nine gynaecology hospital departments, clinics or practices specialised in women's healthcare, located in Europe, South Africa and Israel. POPULATION: Healthy postmenopausal women (n = 1008). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Changes in quality of life using the Women's Health Questionnaire (WHQ) and compliance using a compliance questionnaire and pill count. Adverse event and early discontinuation rates and satisfaction with treatment using a visual analogue scale (VAS). RESULTS: Women taking raloxifene reported greater satisfaction with their treatment as assessed on the VAS (P = 0.004), and a lower proportion, as compared with ccHRT, reported being worried by the treatment (9.6% vs 20.2%, P < 0.01). Women taking ccHRT reported greater deterioration in scores from the WHQ for depressed mood and menstrual symptoms than those taking raloxifene (P < 0.01). For memory, vasomotor symptoms and sexual behaviour, the ccHRT group reported significantly greater mean improvements (P < 0.05). Over half (58.8%) of those taking raloxifene noticed no effect, 37.7% felt better and 3.4% felt worse as measured using the compliance questionnaire. Fifty percent of the women taking ccHRT felt better, 37.8% noticed no effect but over 10% felt worse. More women on raloxifene (94.6%) than on ccHRT (85.9%) reported that they were taking their double-blinded medication regularly (P < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: A lower rate of adverse event-related discontinuations, the lack of negative effects on quality of life and a smaller proportion of women being worried by the drug treatment were associated with higher treatment satisfaction and better compliance in postmenopausal women taking ccHRT or raloxifene.
机译:目的:比较连续联合激素替代疗法(ccHRT)和雷洛昔芬在依从性和生活质量方面的差异,这是一项旨在研究这两种疗法对子宫的影响的大型前瞻性研究的预定次要终点。设计:为期六个月的双盲,随机对照试验。地点:位于欧洲,南非和以色列的一百二十九个妇科医院部门,诊所或专门从事女性保健的诊所。人口:绝经后健康的女性(n = 1008)。主要观察指标:使用妇女健康调查表(WHQ)改善生活质量,并使用依从性调查表和药丸计数来观察依从性。不良事件和早期停用率以及使用视觉模拟量表(VAS)的治疗满意度。结果:接受雷洛昔芬治疗的妇女通过VAS评估后对治疗的满意度更高(P = 0.004),与ccHRT相比,其对治疗的担忧率更低(9.6%vs 20.2%,P <0.01)。与服用雷洛昔芬的女性相比,服用ccHRT的女性在情绪低落和月经症状方面的WHQ评分下降更大(P <0.01)。对于记忆,血管舒缩症状和性行为,ccHRT组报告平均改善显着更大(P <0.05)。使用依从性问卷调查,超过一半(58.8%)的雷洛昔芬服用者未见效果,37.7%感到好,3.4%感到更差。接受ccHRT的女性中有50%感觉好些,37.8%的人感觉没有效果,但超过10%的人感觉更差。接受雷洛昔芬治疗的妇女(94.6%)比使用ccHRT的妇女(85.9%)多,他们报告说他们定期服用双盲药物(P <0.01)。结论:在接受ccHRT或雷洛昔芬治疗的绝经后妇女中,与不良事件相关的停药率较低,对生活质量的负面影响缺乏,对药物治疗感到担忧的妇女比例较小,与更高的治疗满意度和更好的依从性相关。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号