首页> 外文期刊>Evidence-based mental health >How accurate are suicide risk prediction models? Asking the right questions for clinical practice
【24h】

How accurate are suicide risk prediction models? Asking the right questions for clinical practice

机译:自杀风险预测模型有多准确? 向临床实践提出正确的问题

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Prediction models assist in stratifying and quantifying an individual's risk of developing a particular adverse outcome, and are widely used in cardiovascular and cancer medicine. Whether these approaches are accurate in predicting self-harm and suicide has been questioned. We searched for systematic reviews in the suicide risk assessment field, and identified three recent reviews that have examined current tools and models derived using machine learning approaches. In this clinical review, we present a critical appraisal of these reviews, and highlight three major limitations that are shared between them. First, structured tools are not compared with unstructured assessments routine in clinical practice. Second, they do not sufficiently consider a range of performance measures, including negative predictive value and calibration. Third, the potential role of these models as clinical adjuncts is not taken into consideration. We conclude by presenting the view that the current role of prediction models for self-harm and suicide is currently not known, and discuss some methodological issues and implications of some machine learning and other analytic techniques for clinical utility.
机译:预测模型有助于分层和量化个体发展特定不利结果的风险,并且广泛用于心血管和癌症医学。这些方法是否准确预测自我危害,自杀已经受到质疑。我们搜索了自杀风险评估领域的系统性评论,并确定了三个近期审查,已检查使用机器学习方法导出的当前工具和模型。在该临床审查中,我们提出了对这些评论的关键评估,并突出了它们之间共享的三个主要限制。首先,在临床实践中没有将结构化工具与非结构化评估常规进行比较。其次,它们不充分考虑一系列性能措施,包括否定预测值和校准。第三,这些模型作为临床辅助的潜在作用是不考虑的。我们通过介绍自我危害和自杀预测模型的当前作用目前未知,并讨论了一些机器学习和其他分析技术的一些方法问题和临床效用的影响。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号