首页> 外文期刊>Evidence-based complementary and alternative medicine: eCAM >Clinical Evaluation of Acupuncture as Treatment for Complications of Cerebrovascular Accidents: A Randomized, Sham-Controlled, Subject- and Assessor-Blind Trial
【24h】

Clinical Evaluation of Acupuncture as Treatment for Complications of Cerebrovascular Accidents: A Randomized, Sham-Controlled, Subject- and Assessor-Blind Trial

机译:针刺治疗脑血管意外并发症的临床评价:随机,假控制,主题与评估综合症试验

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Background and Purpose. The effect of acupuncture as treatment for poststroke complications is questionable. We performed a randomized, sham-controlled double-blind study to investigate it. Methods. Patients with first-time acute stroke were randomized to receive 24 sessions of either real or sham acupuncture during an eight-week period. The primary outcome measure was change in National Institute of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) score. Secondary outcome measures included changes in Barthel Index (BI), Instrumental Activities of Daily Living (IADL), Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HAM-D), and Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) for pain scores. Results. Of the 52 patients who were randomized to receive acupuncture (n = 28) or placebo (n = 24), 10 patients in the acupuncture group and 9 patients in the placebo group failed to complete the treatment. In total, 18 patients in the acupuncture group and 15 patients in the control group completed the treatment course. Reduction in pain was significantly greater in the acupuncture group than in the control group (p value = 0.04). There were no significant differences in the other measures between the two groups. Conclusions. Acupuncture provided more effective poststroke pain relief than sham acupuncture treatment. However, acupuncture had no better effect on neurological, functional, and psychological improvement.
机译:背景和目的。针灸作为监禁术治疗的影响是值得怀疑的。我们进行了一个随机的假手法控制的双盲研究来调查它。方法。患有首次急性中风的患者随机,在八周的时间内随机随机接受真正的或假针灸的24次。主要结果措施是国家卫生冲程量表(NIHSS)得分的变化。次要结果措施包括条形指数(BI),日常生活(IADL)的工具活动,汉密尔顿抑制评级规模(HAM-D)和视觉模拟量表(VAS)的变化。结果。在随机接受针灸(n = 28)或安慰剂(n = 24)的52名患者中,针灸组中的10名患者和安慰剂组中的9例患者未能完成治疗。总共18名患者在针灸组和15例患者中,对照组完成了治疗课程。针灸组中疼痛的减少明显大于对照组(P值= 0.04)。两组之间的其他措施没有显着差异。结论。针灸提供比假针灸治疗更有效的失败疼痛缓解。然而,针灸对神经系统,功能性和心理改善没有更好的影响。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号