首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Evidence-based Complementary and Alternative Medicine : eCAM >Clinical Evaluation of Acupuncture as Treatment for Complications of Cerebrovascular Accidents: A Randomized Sham-Controlled Subject- and Assessor-Blind Trial
【2h】

Clinical Evaluation of Acupuncture as Treatment for Complications of Cerebrovascular Accidents: A Randomized Sham-Controlled Subject- and Assessor-Blind Trial

机译:针刺治疗脑血管意外并发症的临床评价:一项随机假对照受试者和评估者盲试验

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Background and Purpose. The effect of acupuncture as treatment for poststroke complications is questionable. We performed a randomized, sham-controlled double-blind study to investigate it. Methods. Patients with first-time acute stroke were randomized to receive 24 sessions of either real or sham acupuncture during an eight-week period. The primary outcome measure was change in National Institute of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) score. Secondary outcome measures included changes in Barthel Index (BI), Instrumental Activities of Daily Living (IADL), Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HAM-D), and Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) for pain scores. Results. Of the 52 patients who were randomized to receive acupuncture (n = 28) or placebo (n = 24), 10 patients in the acupuncture group and 9 patients in the placebo group failed to complete the treatment. In total, 18 patients in the acupuncture group and 15 patients in the control group completed the treatment course. Reduction in pain was significantly greater in the acupuncture group than in the control group (p value = 0.04). There were no significant differences in the other measures between the two groups. Conclusions. Acupuncture provided more effective poststroke pain relief than sham acupuncture treatment. However, acupuncture had no better effect on neurological, functional, and psychological improvement.
机译:背景和目的。针灸治疗中风后并发症的效果值得怀疑。我们进行了一项随机,假对照的双盲研究以对其进行研究。方法。初发急性中风的患者在八周内随机接受24次实针或假针刺治疗。主要结果指标是美国国立卫生研究院卒中量表(NIHSS)评分的变化。次要结局指标包括Barthel指数(BI),日常生活工具活动(IADL),汉密尔顿抑郁评估量表(HAM-D)和视觉模拟量表(VAS)的疼痛评分变化。结果。在随机接受针灸(n = 28)或安慰剂(n = 24)的52位患者中,针灸组10位患者和安慰剂组9位患者未能完成治疗。总共,针灸组18例,对照组15例完成了治疗过程。针刺组的疼痛减轻明显大于对照组(p值= 0.04)。两组之间在其他指标上没有显着差异。结论。针刺比深部针刺治疗更有效地缓解中风后疼痛。但是,针灸对神经,功能和心理的改善没有更好的效果。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号