首页> 外文期刊>Gastrointestinal Endoscopy >Implementation of a systematic culturing program to monitor the efficacy of endoscope reprocessing: outcomes and costs
【24h】

Implementation of a systematic culturing program to monitor the efficacy of endoscope reprocessing: outcomes and costs

机译:实施系统培养方案,以监测内窥镜再加工的疗效:结果和成本

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Background and Aims In 2015, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration and Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) issued guidance for duodenoscope culturing and reprocessing in response to outbreaks of carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae (CRE) duodenoscope-related infections. Based on this guidance, we implemented best practices for reprocessing and developed a systematic process for culturing endoscopes with elevator levers. The aim of this study is to report the outcomes and direct costs of this program. Methods First, clinical microbiology data from 2011 to 2014 were reviewed retrospectively to assess for possible elevator lever-equipped endoscope-related CRE infections. Second, a program to systematically culture elevator lever-equipped endoscopes was implemented. Each week, about 25% of the inventory of elevator lever-equipped endoscopes is cultured based on the CDC guidelines. If any cultures return bacterial growth, the endoscope is quarantined pending repeat culturing. The costs of the program, including staff time and supplies, have been calculated. Results From 2011 to 2014, none of 17 patients with documented CRE infection had undergone ERCP or endoscopic ultrasound in the previous 36 months. From June 2015 to September 2016, 285 cultures were performed. Three (1.1%) had bacterial growth, 2 with skin contaminants and 1 with an oral contaminant. The associated endoscopes were quarantined and reprocessed, and repeat cultures were negative. The total estimated cost of our program for an inventory of 20 elevator lever-equipped endoscopes was $30,429.60 per year ($1521.48 per endoscope). Conclusions This 16-month evaluation of a systematic endoscope culturing program identified a low rate of positive cultures after elevator lever endoscope reprocessing. All positive cultures were with non-enteric microorganisms. The program was of modest cost and identified reprocessing procedures that may have led to a low rate of positive cultures.
机译:2015年背景和宗旨,美国食品和药物管理局和疾病控制和预防中心(CDC)发出了非翻译介质培养和再加工的指导,以应对耐肠癌肠杆菌植物(CRE)Duodencope相关感染的爆发。基于这一指导,我们实施了对再处理的最佳实践,并开发了一种具有电梯杠杆的内窥镜的系统过程。本研究的目的是报告该计划的结果和直接费用。方法首先,回顾性评估2011年至2014年2011年至2014年的临床微生物学资料,以评估有可能的电梯杆的内窥镜相关CRE感染。其次,实施了系统培养电梯杆的内窥镜的程序。每周,约25%的电梯杆装备内窥镜库存是根据CDC指南培养的。如果有任何培养物返回细菌生长,内窥镜被隔离重复培养。已经计算了该计划的成本,包括员工时间和用品。结果2011年至2014年,17例记录的CRE感染患者患者在过去36个月内经历了ERCP或内窥镜超声。从2015年6月到2016年9月,进行了285份文化。三(1.1%)具有细菌生长,2例皮肤污染物2,1具有口腔污染物。相关的内窥镜被隔离并进行再加工,重复培养为阴性。我们的20个电梯杠杆的库存计划的总估计成本为每年30,429.60美元(每个内窥镜1521.48美元)。结论这16个月的系统内窥镜培养方案评估鉴定了电梯杆内窥镜后的阳性培养率低。所有阳性培养物都具有非肠溶微生物。该计划具有适度的成本,并确定了可能导致阳性培养物的低速率的再处理程序。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Gastrointestinal Endoscopy》 |2018年第1期|共6页
  • 作者单位

    Gastroenterology Division Department of Medicine University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of;

    Infectious Diseases Division Department of Medicine University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of;

    Gastroenterology Division Department of Medicine University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of;

    Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of;

    Infectious Diseases Division Department of Medicine University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of;

    Perioperative Services Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania;

    Perioperative Services Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania;

    Perioperative Services Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania;

    Gastroenterology Division Department of Medicine University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类 消化系及腹部疾病;
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号