首页> 外文期刊>Evolutionary biology >Dimensionality Reduction Techniques for Visualizing Morphometric Data: Comparing Principal Component Analysis to Nonlinear Methods
【24h】

Dimensionality Reduction Techniques for Visualizing Morphometric Data: Comparing Principal Component Analysis to Nonlinear Methods

机译:用于可视化形态测量数据的维度减少技术:将主成分分析与非线性方法进行比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Principal component analysis (PCA) is the most widely used dimensionality reduction technique in the biological sciences, and is commonly employed to create 2D visualizations of geometric morphometric data. However, interesting biological information may be lost or misrepresented in these plots due to PCA's inability to summarize nonlinear dependencies between variables. Nonlinear alternative methods exist, but their effectiveness has never been tested on morphometric data. Here, the performance of PCA on the task of visualizing morphometric variation is compared to four nonlinear techniques: Sammon Mapping, Isomap, Locally Linear Embedding, and Laplacian Eigenmaps. The performance of methods is assessed on the basis of global and local preservation of pairwise distances for a variety of simulated and empirical datasets. The relative performance of PCA varies in function of the distribution of variation, complexity, and size of datasets. Overall, nonlinear methods show superior preservation of small differences between morphologies compared to PCA.
机译:主成分分析(PCA)是生物科学中最广泛使用的维度减少技术,通常用于创建几何形态学数据的2D可视化。然而,由于PCA无法总结变量之间的非线性依赖性,有趣的生物信息可能在这些绘图中丢失或歪曲这些曲线。存在非线性替代方法,但它们的有效性从未在不同的数据上进行过测试。这里,PCA对可视化性变化的任务的性能与四种非线性技术进行比较:Sammon映射,ISOMAP,局部线性嵌入和拉普拉斯eIgenmaps。在全球和局部保存的基础上,对各种模拟和经验数据集的成对距离的基础进行评估。 PCA的相对性能在分布的变化,复杂性和数据集大小的函数中变化。总体而言,非线性方法显示出与PCA相比的形貌之间的小差异的保存。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号