...
首页> 外文期刊>Emergency medicine journal: EMJ >051?The ACUTE (ambulance CPAP: use, treatment effect and economics) feasibility study: a pilot randomised controlled trial of prehospital CPAP for acute respiratory failure
【24h】

051?The ACUTE (ambulance CPAP: use, treatment effect and economics) feasibility study: a pilot randomised controlled trial of prehospital CPAP for acute respiratory failure

机译:051?急性(救护车CPAP:使用,治疗效果和经济学)可行性研究:急性呼吸衰竭的预科CPAP试点随机对照试验

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Acute respiratory failure (ARF) is a common and life-threatening medical emergency. Continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) is a potentially beneficial prehospital treatment, but it is uncertain whether this could improve important outcomes in NHS ambulance services.An individually randomised, external pilot study was conducted to test the feasibility of a definitive pragmatic trial. Adults with respiratory distress and peripheral oxygen saturations below British Thoracic Society target levels were recruited from the West Midlands Ambulance Service between August 2017 and July 2018. Participants were randomised 1:1 to prehospital CPAP or standard oxygen therapy. Feasibility objectives estimated the: incidence of eligible patients; proportion recruited and allocated to treatment appropriately; adherence to allocated treatment; retention and data completeness; and 30-day mortality, as a potential primary outcome for a definitive trial.Over 12 months, 77 patients were enrolled (CPAP arm 42, standard oxygen arm 35 cases, target 120). CPAP was fully delivered as planned in 74% (target 75%). There were no major protocol violations/non-compliances (target 0%). Full data were available for key outcomes (target ≥90%). Mortality was higher than expected (overall 27.3%, CPAP arm 28.6% n=12/42, standard care arm 25.7% n=9/35). Of deceased patients, 14/21 (68%) either did not have a respiratory condition or had ceiling of treatment decisions excluding hospital non-invasive ventilation and critical care. Two patients required emergency department treatment for a pneumothorax, neither having received prehospital CPAP. There were no other serious adverse events.The lower than expected recruitment rate, limited compliance with CPAP, and the difficulty in identifying patients who could benefit from CPAP, indicate limited potential for prehospital CPAP to reduce mortality. A definitive effectiveness trial is therefore not recommended. These findings also argue against routine implementation of CPAP into NHS ambulance services.
机译:急性呼吸衰竭(ARF)是一种常见而危及生命的医疗紧急情况。连续正气道压力(CPAP)是一种潜在的有益的预科治疗,但这是不确定这是否可以改善NHS救护车服务中的重要结果。单独随机化,进行外部试验研究,以测试明确的务实试验的可行性。在2017年8月至2018年8月期间,从西米米德兰斯救护车服务中招募了呼吸窘迫和外周氧饱和的成年人,从西米米德兰斯救护车服务中招募。参与者被随机分为1:1至前孢子CPAP或标准氧疗法。可行性目标估计:符合条件患者的发病率;比例招募并适当地分配治疗;坚持分配治疗;保留和数据完整性;和30天的死亡率,作为最终试验的潜在主要结果。12个月,77名患者注册(CPAP ARM 42,标准氧臂35例,目标120)。 CPAP按计划完全交付74%(目标75%)。没有主要的议定书违规行为/不合规(目标0%)。全数据可用于关键结果(目标≥90%)。死亡率高于预期(总体27.3%,CPAP臂28.6%n = 12/42,标准护理臂25.7%n = 9/35)。第14/21名(68%)未经医院无侵入性通气和关键护理,14/21例(68%)没有呼吸状况或患有治疗决定的天花板。两名患者需要急诊肿瘤治疗气胸,既不接受的预孢子CPAP。没有其他严重的不良事件。低于预期的招聘率,有限遵守CPAP,以及识别可以从CPAP中受益的患者的难度表明,预孢子CPAP降低死亡率的有限潜力。因此,不建议使用最终的有效性试验。这些调查结果还反对CPAP进入NHS救护服务的日常实施。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号