首页> 外文期刊>Emergency medicine journal: EMJ >Physician-identified barriers to and facilitators of shared decision-making in the Emergency Department: an exploratory analysis
【24h】

Physician-identified barriers to and facilitators of shared decision-making in the Emergency Department: an exploratory analysis

机译:急诊部门共享决策的医生确定的障碍:探索性分析

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Objectives Shared decision-making (SDM) is receiving increasing attention in emergency medicine because of its potential to increase patient engagement and decrease unnecessary healthcare utilisation. This study sought to explore physician-identified barriers to and facilitators of SDM in the ED. Methods We conducted semistructured interviews with practising emergency physicians (EP) with the aim of understanding when and why EPs engage in SDM, and when and why they feel unable to engage in SDM. Interviews were transcribed verbatim and a threemember team coded all transcripts in an iterative fashion using a directed approach to qualitative content analysis. We identified emergent themes, and organised themes based on an integrative theoretical model that combined the theory of planned behaviour and social cognitive theory. Results Fifteen EPs practising in the New England region of the USA were interviewed. Physicians described the following barriers: time constraints, clinical uncertainty, fear of a bad outcome, certain patient characteristics, lack of follow-up and other emotional and logistical stressors. They noted that risk stratification methods, the perception that SDM decreased liability and their own improving clinical skills facilitated their use of SDM. They also noted that the culture of the institution could play a role in discouraging or promoting SDM, and that patients could encourage SDM by specifically asking about alternatives. Conclusions EPs face many barriers to using SDM. Some, such as lack of follow-up, are unique to the ED; others, such as the challenges of communicating uncertainty, may affect other providers. Many of the barriers to SDM are amenable to intervention, but may be of variable importance in different EDs. Further research should attempt to identify which barriers are most prevalent and most amenable to intervention, as well as capitalise on the facilitators noted.
机译:目标共享决策(SDM)正在接受急诊医学的增加,因为它可能增加患者参与并降低不必要的医疗保健利用。本研究试图探索ED中SDM的医生识别的障碍和促进者。方法我们与练习急诊医生(EP)进行了半系统访谈,以何时以及为何EPS从事SDM的何时以及为何,以及为什么他们觉得无法从事SDM。采访是逐字转录的,并使用针对定性内容分析的方法以迭代方式编码所有成绩单。我们确定了基于综合理论模型的紧急主题和组织主题,使计划行为和社会认知理论结合在一起。结果美国新英格兰地区的15次EPS练习接受了采访。医生描述了以下障碍:时间限制,临床不确定性,担心不良结果,某些患者特征,缺乏随访等情绪和后勤压力。他们指出,风险分层方法,即SDM减少责任和自身改善临床技能的看法促进了他们使用SDM。他们还指出,该机构的文化可以发挥令人沮丧或促进SDM的作用,并且通过特别询问替代方案,患者可以鼓励SDM。结论EPS面临着使用SDM的许多障碍。一些,例如缺乏随访,是ed的独特;其他人,例如沟通不确定性的挑战,可能会影响其他提供者。 SDM的许多障碍都是为了干预,但可能在不同的EDS中变得可变重要性。进一步的研究应该试图确定哪些障碍最普遍,最适合干预,以及利用所指出的促进者。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Emergency medicine journal: EMJ》 |2019年第6期|共9页
  • 作者单位

    Univ Massachusetts Med Sch Baystate Inst Healthcare Delivery &

    Populat Sci Springfield MA USA;

    Univ Massachusetts Med Sch Baystate Inst Healthcare Delivery &

    Populat Sci Springfield MA USA;

    Univ Massachusetts Med Sch Baystate Dept Emergency Med Springfield MA USA;

    Maimonides Hosp Dept Emergency Med Brooklyn NY 11219 USA;

    Univ Massachusetts Med Sch Baystate Dept Emergency Med Springfield MA USA;

    Univ Massachusetts Med Sch Baystate Dept Emergency Med Springfield MA USA;

    Univ Massachusetts Med Sch Baystate Inst Healthcare Delivery &

    Populat Sci Springfield MA USA;

    Univ Massachusetts Sch Med Dept Med Worcester MA USA;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类 治疗学;
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号